"Our reason arises, at the very least, from this twofold lesson of sensuous revelations and human testimonies"
About this Quote
Hamann stages reason not as a sterile faculty humming in isolation, but as a latecomer: something that "arises" after we have already been impressed upon by the world and implicated with other people. The line’s quiet provocation is its double anchoring of rationality in what Enlightenment thinkers often tried to purify out of it: the senses ("sensuous revelations") and tradition, language, and community ("human testimonies"). He’s smuggling a thesis into a seemingly mild sentence: reason is derivative, not sovereign.
The phrasing matters. "Lesson" casts knowing as apprenticed and received, not self-generated. "Revelations" is a deliberately charged word for a philosopher in an era of rational confidence; it hints that the senses don’t merely deliver data, they disclose meanings we don’t fully control. Then "testimonies" shifts the scene from the individual mind to the social world. Testimony is fallible, secondhand, historically situated - exactly the kind of source a strict rationalist would demote. Hamann elevates it, implying that even the most "objective" thinking is scaffolded by inherited words, metaphors, authorities, and the credibility we extend to others.
Contextually, this is Hamann’s anti-Enlightenment gambit from inside the Enlightenment: a critique of the fantasy of pure, autonomous reason. He anticipates later arguments about the embodied mind and the social life of knowledge, while keeping his edge: if reason depends on sense and testimony, then the rationalist’s claim to stand above history, culture, and faith starts to look less like clarity and more like a rhetorical pose.
The phrasing matters. "Lesson" casts knowing as apprenticed and received, not self-generated. "Revelations" is a deliberately charged word for a philosopher in an era of rational confidence; it hints that the senses don’t merely deliver data, they disclose meanings we don’t fully control. Then "testimonies" shifts the scene from the individual mind to the social world. Testimony is fallible, secondhand, historically situated - exactly the kind of source a strict rationalist would demote. Hamann elevates it, implying that even the most "objective" thinking is scaffolded by inherited words, metaphors, authorities, and the credibility we extend to others.
Contextually, this is Hamann’s anti-Enlightenment gambit from inside the Enlightenment: a critique of the fantasy of pure, autonomous reason. He anticipates later arguments about the embodied mind and the social life of knowledge, while keeping his edge: if reason depends on sense and testimony, then the rationalist’s claim to stand above history, culture, and faith starts to look less like clarity and more like a rhetorical pose.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|
More Quotes by Johann
Add to List




