"Our responsibility for BLM lands is multiple-use, meaning a variety of needs and uses"
About this Quote
“Multiple-use” is the kind of civic phrase that sounds like balance and smells like loophole. Gale Norton, speaking from the posture of a public servant, reaches for bureaucratic harmony: the Bureau of Land Management isn’t supposed to be a park service, or an energy agency, or a rancher’s concierge. It’s all of them, in constant negotiation. The intent is calming: don’t panic, no single interest owns these lands.
The subtext, though, is where the power sits. “A variety of needs and uses” is deliberately unspecific, a roomy umbrella that can shelter radically different agendas. Conservation, recreation, grazing, mining, drilling: by compressing them into a neutral list of “uses,” the quote makes conflict sound like mere scheduling. That’s the rhetorical trick. It shifts the debate from values (What should public land be for?) to management (How do we accommodate everyone?), which tends to favor the interests most equipped to navigate permitting, lobbying, and long timelines.
Context matters: Norton served as Interior Secretary during the George W. Bush era, when Western public lands were a battleground over energy expansion and regulatory restraint. In that climate, “multiple-use” isn’t just policy vocabulary; it’s a legitimizing frame. It signals fidelity to a statutory mandate while avoiding the politically risky admission that “multiple-use” often means trade-offs, and trade-offs often mean someone loses.
The quote works because it performs moderation. It offers a comforting abstraction that can be quoted back by nearly anyone, even as the real decisions get made in the fine print.
The subtext, though, is where the power sits. “A variety of needs and uses” is deliberately unspecific, a roomy umbrella that can shelter radically different agendas. Conservation, recreation, grazing, mining, drilling: by compressing them into a neutral list of “uses,” the quote makes conflict sound like mere scheduling. That’s the rhetorical trick. It shifts the debate from values (What should public land be for?) to management (How do we accommodate everyone?), which tends to favor the interests most equipped to navigate permitting, lobbying, and long timelines.
Context matters: Norton served as Interior Secretary during the George W. Bush era, when Western public lands were a battleground over energy expansion and regulatory restraint. In that climate, “multiple-use” isn’t just policy vocabulary; it’s a legitimizing frame. It signals fidelity to a statutory mandate while avoiding the politically risky admission that “multiple-use” often means trade-offs, and trade-offs often mean someone loses.
The quote works because it performs moderation. It offers a comforting abstraction that can be quoted back by nearly anyone, even as the real decisions get made in the fine print.
Quote Details
| Topic | Nature |
|---|
More Quotes by Gale
Add to List
