"Out with stereotypes, feminism proclaims. But stereotypes are the west's stunning sexual personae, the vehicles of art's assault against nature. The moment there is imagination, there is myth"
About this Quote
Paglia kicks the door in on a familiar feminist slogan and then refuses to let anyone retreat to safe positions. “Out with stereotypes” is framed as a tidy act of moral housekeeping; she answers with a provocation: stereotypes aren’t just social trash, they’re cultural technology. Calling them “the west’s stunning sexual personae” turns what activists treat as harm into what artists have long used as shorthand - masks that let desire, fear, and power become legible on a stage, a canvas, a screen. “Vehicles of art’s assault against nature” is classic Paglia: barbed, grand, half-classical, half-tabloid. She’s arguing that art doesn’t politely mirror “natural” reality; it stylizes, exaggerates, violates it. Sexual types - vamp, innocent, predator, muse - are part of that stylization.
The subtext is a warning about purity politics. If feminism aims to abolish stereotype altogether, Paglia implies, it risks flattening erotic imagination into bureaucratic respectability. She’s not defending discrimination; she’s defending the unruly, symbolic machinery that produces myths, and by extension produces culture. Her clincher, “The moment there is imagination, there is myth,” insists that human beings don’t perceive neutrally. We narrate. We archetype. We project.
Context matters: Paglia emerged as an abrasive dissenter from late-20th-century academic feminism, suspicious of its institutional tone and inclined to treat sexuality as a dark, persistent force rather than a problem solvable by correct language. The line works because it weaponizes aesthetic glamour (“stunning,” “personae”) against moral certainty, forcing readers to choose: do you want a culture that is safer, or one that is alive? Paglia’s bet is that you can’t fully have both.
The subtext is a warning about purity politics. If feminism aims to abolish stereotype altogether, Paglia implies, it risks flattening erotic imagination into bureaucratic respectability. She’s not defending discrimination; she’s defending the unruly, symbolic machinery that produces myths, and by extension produces culture. Her clincher, “The moment there is imagination, there is myth,” insists that human beings don’t perceive neutrally. We narrate. We archetype. We project.
Context matters: Paglia emerged as an abrasive dissenter from late-20th-century academic feminism, suspicious of its institutional tone and inclined to treat sexuality as a dark, persistent force rather than a problem solvable by correct language. The line works because it weaponizes aesthetic glamour (“stunning,” “personae”) against moral certainty, forcing readers to choose: do you want a culture that is safer, or one that is alive? Paglia’s bet is that you can’t fully have both.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|---|
| Source | Camille Paglia, Sexual Personae: Art and Decadence from Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson, 1990 (passages on the role of stereotypes/personae in art). |
More Quotes by Camille
Add to List




