"Outsourcing and globalization of manufacturing allows companies to reduce costs, benefits consumers with lower cost goods and services, causes economic expansion that reduces unemployment, and increases productivity and job creation"
About this Quote
Elder packs a full policy brief into one sentence, and that’s the point: the claim is designed to feel like a self-evident chain reaction. Outsource, save money, pass savings to consumers, grow the economy, watch unemployment fall, then cue the productivity boom. The rhetoric works by stacking only the upsides, turning a contested economic trade-off into a frictionless narrative of mutual benefit. Every clause is a promise; none is a concession.
The intent is ideological and strategic. As a journalist-commentator whose brand trades on contrarian certainty, Elder frames globalization not as a messy rearrangement of power but as a moral and practical good: cheaper goods for regular people, more jobs overall, progress. That “benefits consumers” move is key subtext. It recasts workers primarily as shoppers, shifting the debate from wage security and community stability to price tags at checkout. If you’re paying less at Walmart, the argument implies, you’ve already been compensated.
What’s left unsaid is doing a lot of work. “Allows companies to reduce costs” politely sidesteps whose costs: labor’s bargaining power, factory towns’ tax bases, workers’ career ladders. “Economic expansion” and “job creation” are presented as automatic, but the distribution question is carefully avoided - where are the new jobs, what do they pay, and who can realistically take them? The line lands in a late-20th/early-21st-century U.S. context where globalization is both an engine of corporate profit and a political fault line, and Elder’s sentence reads like a rebuttal to populist anger: don’t blame the system; the system is feeding you.
The intent is ideological and strategic. As a journalist-commentator whose brand trades on contrarian certainty, Elder frames globalization not as a messy rearrangement of power but as a moral and practical good: cheaper goods for regular people, more jobs overall, progress. That “benefits consumers” move is key subtext. It recasts workers primarily as shoppers, shifting the debate from wage security and community stability to price tags at checkout. If you’re paying less at Walmart, the argument implies, you’ve already been compensated.
What’s left unsaid is doing a lot of work. “Allows companies to reduce costs” politely sidesteps whose costs: labor’s bargaining power, factory towns’ tax bases, workers’ career ladders. “Economic expansion” and “job creation” are presented as automatic, but the distribution question is carefully avoided - where are the new jobs, what do they pay, and who can realistically take them? The line lands in a late-20th/early-21st-century U.S. context where globalization is both an engine of corporate profit and a political fault line, and Elder’s sentence reads like a rebuttal to populist anger: don’t blame the system; the system is feeding you.
Quote Details
| Topic | Business |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Larry
Add to List



