"Over the next four years, I will continue to listen to different views and accept different suggestions"
About this Quote
In a political culture that often rewards certainty and punishes hesitation, Chen Shui-bian’s promise to “continue to listen to different views and accept different suggestions” is less a self-help affirmation than a governing signal flare. A statesman doesn’t talk about listening unless he needs to be seen listening. The line is doing credibility work: it frames flexibility as steadiness, and responsiveness as strength, at a moment when leaders are usually accused of either arrogance (steamrolling opponents) or weakness (being pushed around).
The phrase “over the next four years” is the giveaway. This isn’t abstract humility; it’s an administration-length pledge, aimed at calming markets, institutions, and voters who fear abrupt turns. It also implies a second-term (or newly secured mandate) context: Chen is positioning his presidency as stable enough to plan in full cycles, but open enough to negotiate within them. The structure is careful: “different views” first, “different suggestions” second. Listening costs nothing; accepting costs political capital. Pairing them lets him project openness while keeping the commitment strategically vague. Accept which suggestions, from whom, and on what terms? That ambiguity is the point.
Subtextually, it’s an appeal across divides: to critics who doubt his legitimacy, to coalition partners who want influence, to civil society that demands inclusion. The line sketches a democratic ideal without conceding specific policy ground. It works because it treats pluralism not as chaos to be managed, but as input to be harvested - a soft power move that tries to turn contention into consent.
The phrase “over the next four years” is the giveaway. This isn’t abstract humility; it’s an administration-length pledge, aimed at calming markets, institutions, and voters who fear abrupt turns. It also implies a second-term (or newly secured mandate) context: Chen is positioning his presidency as stable enough to plan in full cycles, but open enough to negotiate within them. The structure is careful: “different views” first, “different suggestions” second. Listening costs nothing; accepting costs political capital. Pairing them lets him project openness while keeping the commitment strategically vague. Accept which suggestions, from whom, and on what terms? That ambiguity is the point.
Subtextually, it’s an appeal across divides: to critics who doubt his legitimacy, to coalition partners who want influence, to civil society that demands inclusion. The line sketches a democratic ideal without conceding specific policy ground. It works because it treats pluralism not as chaos to be managed, but as input to be harvested - a soft power move that tries to turn contention into consent.
Quote Details
| Topic | Servant Leadership |
|---|
More Quotes by Chen
Add to List









