"Pacifist propaganda and the resolutions of the parliamentarians encouraged such treaties, and toward the end of the nineteenth century their number had increased considerably"
About this Quote
Pacifism is cast here not as conscience but as a pressure group with a printing press. Quidde’s phrasing, “pacifist propaganda,” is deliberately loaded: it collapses a moral stance into a tactics-and-messaging operation, suggesting naïveté at best and manipulation at worst. Pairing it with “the resolutions of the parliamentarians” completes the jab. Both the street-level idealists and the suited legislators are presented as accelerants for treaty-making, as if peace is less a hard-won settlement than a fashionable paperwork trend.
The verb “encouraged” does quiet work. It implies these treaties weren’t demanded by strategic necessity; they were coaxed into existence by sentiment and legislative theater. And “toward the end of the nineteenth century their number had increased considerably” reads like a skeptical statistic: not evidence of progress, but of proliferation. Quidde is hinting at a diplomatic inflation problem - the more treaties you sign, the less each one is worth, especially if enforcement is weak and the great powers treat agreements as decor rather than constraint.
Context matters. The late 1800s were a paradox: booming international law and arbitration movements alongside intensifying imperial competition and arms buildups. “Treaties” multiplied because states were trying to civilize rivalry without surrendering advantage. Quidde, a liberal critic wary of militarism, seems to be warning that peace politics can produce a comforting architecture of words that masks the underlying machinery of power. The subtext isn’t anti-peace so much as anti-illusion: paperwork cannot substitute for political will, and moral campaigns can become a pretext for complacency.
The verb “encouraged” does quiet work. It implies these treaties weren’t demanded by strategic necessity; they were coaxed into existence by sentiment and legislative theater. And “toward the end of the nineteenth century their number had increased considerably” reads like a skeptical statistic: not evidence of progress, but of proliferation. Quidde is hinting at a diplomatic inflation problem - the more treaties you sign, the less each one is worth, especially if enforcement is weak and the great powers treat agreements as decor rather than constraint.
Context matters. The late 1800s were a paradox: booming international law and arbitration movements alongside intensifying imperial competition and arms buildups. “Treaties” multiplied because states were trying to civilize rivalry without surrendering advantage. Quidde, a liberal critic wary of militarism, seems to be warning that peace politics can produce a comforting architecture of words that masks the underlying machinery of power. The subtext isn’t anti-peace so much as anti-illusion: paperwork cannot substitute for political will, and moral campaigns can become a pretext for complacency.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Ludwig
Add to List





