"Painting is an illusion, a piece of magic, so what you see is not what you see"

Philip Guston's quote, "Painting is an illusion, a piece of magic, so what you see is not what you see", encapsulates an extensive philosophical understanding of art and understanding. At its core, this statement challenges us to reevaluate the nature of visual experience.

First of all, the concept that painting is an "impression" recommends that what appears on a canvas is not merely a direct representation of reality, but a building and construction produced by the artist. Guston mean the transformative power of art, where a few strokes of paint can evoke intricate feelings and concepts far beyond the basic surface areas they occupy. This aligns with the concept that art is a mirror of the artist's inner world-- a subjective reality that might not associate directly with the concrete world.

Furthermore, explaining painting as a "piece of magic" suggests a sense of wonder and mysterious appeal in the creative procedure. It resonates with the idea that art can transcend the normal, blending the audience into alternative realms and feelings. Magic, much like painting, runs between truth and imagination, crafting experiences that defy uncomplicated understanding.

The expression "so what you see is not what you see" provokes much deeper reflection about perception. Guston recommends that our initial visual consumption of a painting may not genuinely catch its essence. He invites audiences to look beyond surface looks to discover concealed significances and feelings. This challenges the observer to engage actively with the artwork, deciphering its narratives, objectives, and resonances.

In amount, Guston's quote motivates a multidimensional engagement with art, where both emotional instinct and intellectual query are needed to value its depths. It reminds us that art is as much about perception as it is about production, urging us to look beyond the literal to check out the symbolic secrets underneath the surface area.