"Painting is seen as picture making, the making of an art object, something that can stand on its own"
About this Quote
There is a quiet jab tucked into Wright's plainspoken line: painting gets misread as a kind of product demo. "Picture making" and "the making of an art object" sound neutral, but the repetition is doing work, narrowing the public's idea of painting down to a deliverable. The phrase "seen as" is the tell. Wright isn't defining painting; he's diagnosing a popular misunderstanding, the way galleries, collectors, and even casual viewers often treat a canvas as a self-sufficient thing you can buy, hang, and be done with.
"Something that can stand on its own" reads like praise, yet it carries suspicion. Stand on its own from what? From the artist's labor, from process, from the mess of revision and failure, from the room and the moment in which it was made. Wright is pushing against the myth of the autonomous masterpiece, the idea that the best art arrives as a sealed unit, detached from circumstance. That's a very modern, very market-friendly fantasy: if the object is complete in itself, you don't have to grapple with the systems around it. You can own it without owing anything to the story behind it.
Coming from a public figure, the remark also sounds like a defense of making that isn't instantly legible. It's an argument for painting as an ongoing act - closer to thinking out loud than manufacturing. The subtext is blunt: when we reduce painting to a standalone object, we train ourselves to value art for its portability and prestige, not for its ability to complicate how we see.
"Something that can stand on its own" reads like praise, yet it carries suspicion. Stand on its own from what? From the artist's labor, from process, from the mess of revision and failure, from the room and the moment in which it was made. Wright is pushing against the myth of the autonomous masterpiece, the idea that the best art arrives as a sealed unit, detached from circumstance. That's a very modern, very market-friendly fantasy: if the object is complete in itself, you don't have to grapple with the systems around it. You can own it without owing anything to the story behind it.
Coming from a public figure, the remark also sounds like a defense of making that isn't instantly legible. It's an argument for painting as an ongoing act - closer to thinking out loud than manufacturing. The subtext is blunt: when we reduce painting to a standalone object, we train ourselves to value art for its portability and prestige, not for its ability to complicate how we see.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Peter
Add to List





