"Parks are idealizations of nature, but nature in fact is not a condition of the ideal"
About this Quote
The second clause does the real damage: “nature in fact is not a condition of the ideal.” Smithson flips the usual Romantic hierarchy, where nature supplies purity and the ideal is a higher, cleaner version of it. He insists the ideal doesn’t grow out of nature at all; it’s an imposed category, a cultural instrument. Real nature is entropic, indifferent, and messy - more landfill, mudflat, and erosion than postcard meadow. In Smithson’s world, nature isn’t a stable reference point you can perfect; it’s a process that resists being frozen into a symbol.
Context matters: Smithson is a key figure in Land Art, drawn to quarries, salt lakes, and industrial ruins - places where “nature” and human extraction are inseparable. His work and writing keep pointing at the same anxiety in postwar America: the desire to package the earth as scenery while the real terrain is being reorganized by capital, infrastructure, and decay. The park becomes a small, polite lie that makes the larger transformation easier to ignore.
Quote Details
| Topic | Nature |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Smithson, Robert. (2026, January 16). Parks are idealizations of nature, but nature in fact is not a condition of the ideal. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/parks-are-idealizations-of-nature-but-nature-in-95721/
Chicago Style
Smithson, Robert. "Parks are idealizations of nature, but nature in fact is not a condition of the ideal." FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/parks-are-idealizations-of-nature-but-nature-in-95721/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Parks are idealizations of nature, but nature in fact is not a condition of the ideal." FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/parks-are-idealizations-of-nature-but-nature-in-95721/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.








