"Party domination and State leadership are concepts incompatible with one another"
About this Quote
The intent is to delegitimize parties as inherently selfish machines and recast the state as something purer, higher, almost technocratic. It’s a rhetorical cleanse: if parties are "domination", then the alternative can be marketed as "leadership" rather than rule. The subtext is that democracy’s pluralism is not just inefficient but conceptually wrong - a category error. That framing matters because it turns political conflict into a moral failing, and it pre-justifies extraordinary measures: rule by decree, the sidelining of legislatures, the elevation of "national" interest as defined by a narrow governing circle.
The irony is that Papen’s own career illustrates how this language functions as a solvent. In practice, separating "state" from "party" doesn’t abolish faction; it just relocates it behind closed doors, where accountability thins out. Under Weimar’s crisis conditions, the promise of "leadership" was a seductive shortcut. This quote captures how authoritarianism often arrives not with a boot on the table, but with a tidy definition that makes power sound like housekeeping.
Quote Details
| Topic | Leadership |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Papen, Franz von. (2026, January 16). Party domination and State leadership are concepts incompatible with one another. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/party-domination-and-state-leadership-are-135379/
Chicago Style
Papen, Franz von. "Party domination and State leadership are concepts incompatible with one another." FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/party-domination-and-state-leadership-are-135379/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Party domination and State leadership are concepts incompatible with one another." FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/party-domination-and-state-leadership-are-135379/. Accessed 16 Feb. 2026.










