"People actually get sponsors based on the merits of the Cup, not on the merits of the sailors"
About this Quote
The subtext is blunt: sponsorship isn’t patronage, it’s marketing. The Cup (read: the brand, the broadcast, the spectacle, the civic prestige) is a clean, scalable asset. Sailors are variable, political, accident-prone, and hard to package. By separating the “Cup” from “the sailors,” Sweeney elevates institutions over individuals and quietly normalizes a hierarchy where labor is essential but not central to value.
Contextually, this feels like the rhetoric of major sporting events used to justify public courting of corporate money: keep your eyes on the flagship, not the crew. It’s also a soft rebuke to romantic sports narratives. The line punctures the myth that excellence automatically attracts support; what attracts support is an audience, a logo-friendly story, and an event big enough to swallow everyone inside it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Sports |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Sweeney, John. (2026, January 15). People actually get sponsors based on the merits of the Cup, not on the merits of the sailors. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/people-actually-get-sponsors-based-on-the-merits-151843/
Chicago Style
Sweeney, John. "People actually get sponsors based on the merits of the Cup, not on the merits of the sailors." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/people-actually-get-sponsors-based-on-the-merits-151843/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"People actually get sponsors based on the merits of the Cup, not on the merits of the sailors." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/people-actually-get-sponsors-based-on-the-merits-151843/. Accessed 21 Feb. 2026.


