"People always ask about my influences, and they cite a bunch of people I've never heard of"
About this Quote
Norton Juster’s line lands like a dry architectural sketch: spare, confident, and quietly demolishing someone else’s assumptions. On its face it’s a joke about ignorance - his, theirs, or both. Underneath, it’s a refusal of the neat genealogies we love to build around artists and thinkers, the tidy family trees of “influences” that turn a living practice into a museum label.
The intent feels twofold. First, it punctures the interview ritual where audiences want a key: name the right predecessors and you become legible. Juster shrugs off that demand with a perfectly calibrated embarrassment that is also a flex. Second, it exposes a status game. When people “cite a bunch of people,” they aren’t just being curious; they’re auditioning their own cultural literacy, trying to place him inside a canon that flatters the citer as much as the creator. His punchline returns the awkwardness to sender.
The subtext is especially pointed coming from an architect, a field where influence talk can calcify into dogma: schools, movements, lineages, commandments. Juster suggests that what shapes a sensibility isn’t always a list of names. It’s lived experience, constraints, childhood obsessions, public spaces, bad buildings, great books - the messy, uncreditable stuff.
And from the author of The Phantom Tollbooth, it reads like a manifesto for imagination: real originality often isn’t a heroic break from predecessors; it’s an honest ignorance of the “right” references, coupled with the nerve to build anyway.
The intent feels twofold. First, it punctures the interview ritual where audiences want a key: name the right predecessors and you become legible. Juster shrugs off that demand with a perfectly calibrated embarrassment that is also a flex. Second, it exposes a status game. When people “cite a bunch of people,” they aren’t just being curious; they’re auditioning their own cultural literacy, trying to place him inside a canon that flatters the citer as much as the creator. His punchline returns the awkwardness to sender.
The subtext is especially pointed coming from an architect, a field where influence talk can calcify into dogma: schools, movements, lineages, commandments. Juster suggests that what shapes a sensibility isn’t always a list of names. It’s lived experience, constraints, childhood obsessions, public spaces, bad buildings, great books - the messy, uncreditable stuff.
And from the author of The Phantom Tollbooth, it reads like a manifesto for imagination: real originality often isn’t a heroic break from predecessors; it’s an honest ignorance of the “right” references, coupled with the nerve to build anyway.
Quote Details
| Topic | Witty One-Liners |
|---|---|
| Source | Attributed to Norton Juster — appears on the Norton Juster entry on Wikiquote (quote collection). |
More Quotes by Norton
Add to List


