"People at .08 are too impaired to drive. Studies show that at .08, the ability to perform critical driving functions is decreased by as much as 60 percent"
About this Quote
Lautenberg’s line is built to do one thing: turn a moral debate into a measurable risk. By leading with “.08” rather than “drunk,” he sidesteps the fuzzy, self-serving definitions people use to excuse themselves. Numbers don’t negotiate. They sound clinical, inevitable, policy-ready. The follow-up - “Studies show” - is the legislator’s power phrase: an appeal not to personal tragedy or virtue, but to institutional authority. It frames the question as settled science, making opposition feel less like disagreement and more like denial.
The real craft is in “critical driving functions” and “as much as 60 percent.” “Critical” implies non-negotiable competencies: reaction time, judgment, coordination - the stuff you need not to kill someone. It’s not “slightly worse,” it’s the core system failing. And “as much as” is doing strategic work. It’s legally careful (he’s not promising a universal 60% hit), but rhetorically maximal: it plants the upper-bound fear in the listener’s mind while keeping a veneer of precision.
Context matters: Lautenberg was a leading voice in tightening DUI standards nationally, including pushing states toward a .08 legal limit by tying compliance to federal highway funding. This is politics in its most technocratic form: translating public safety into a statistic that can justify coercion. The subtext is blunt: if you argue for “personal responsibility” over limits, you’re implicitly volunteering the rest of us as your crash-test dummies.
The real craft is in “critical driving functions” and “as much as 60 percent.” “Critical” implies non-negotiable competencies: reaction time, judgment, coordination - the stuff you need not to kill someone. It’s not “slightly worse,” it’s the core system failing. And “as much as” is doing strategic work. It’s legally careful (he’s not promising a universal 60% hit), but rhetorically maximal: it plants the upper-bound fear in the listener’s mind while keeping a veneer of precision.
Context matters: Lautenberg was a leading voice in tightening DUI standards nationally, including pushing states toward a .08 legal limit by tying compliance to federal highway funding. This is politics in its most technocratic form: translating public safety into a statistic that can justify coercion. The subtext is blunt: if you argue for “personal responsibility” over limits, you’re implicitly volunteering the rest of us as your crash-test dummies.
Quote Details
| Topic | Health |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Frank
Add to List





