"People kind of tend to mystify design and architecture by suggesting you need to train"
About this Quote
Newson is puncturing a protective myth: that design and architecture are rarefied disciplines accessible only through formal initiation. The word “mystify” does a lot of work here. It suggests not just misunderstanding but an active fogging-up, a social habit that keeps taste and power in the hands of credentialed gatekeepers. By adding “kind of” and “tend to,” he softens the blow just enough to sound conversational rather than crusading, but the target is clear: the cultural reflex that treats built objects like they descend from a priesthood.
His swipe at “suggesting you need to train” isn’t anti-skill so much as anti-awe. Newson knows better than anyone that competence matters; his career is built on obsessive craft and engineering. The point is that training gets misused as a rhetorical shield. When a chair is uncomfortable or a building is hostile, “you don’t understand design” becomes a convenient escape hatch. He’s arguing for demystification as accountability: if design affects everyone, everyone gets to have an opinion that counts.
Context matters. In an era when “design thinking” is marketed as a corporate superpower and starchitects become celebrities, the public is encouraged to admire rather than interrogate. Newson’s line pushes back against that spectatorship. It invites a more democratic relationship to the designed world: curiosity over reverence, critique over deference. The subtext is almost populist: you may not have the diploma, but you have a body, a home, a commute, a daily encounter with objects that either help or hinder you. That lived experience is expertise, too.
His swipe at “suggesting you need to train” isn’t anti-skill so much as anti-awe. Newson knows better than anyone that competence matters; his career is built on obsessive craft and engineering. The point is that training gets misused as a rhetorical shield. When a chair is uncomfortable or a building is hostile, “you don’t understand design” becomes a convenient escape hatch. He’s arguing for demystification as accountability: if design affects everyone, everyone gets to have an opinion that counts.
Context matters. In an era when “design thinking” is marketed as a corporate superpower and starchitects become celebrities, the public is encouraged to admire rather than interrogate. Newson’s line pushes back against that spectatorship. It invites a more democratic relationship to the designed world: curiosity over reverence, critique over deference. The subtext is almost populist: you may not have the diploma, but you have a body, a home, a commute, a daily encounter with objects that either help or hinder you. That lived experience is expertise, too.
Quote Details
| Topic | Learning |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Marc
Add to List





