"People often say that humans have always eaten animals, as if this is a justification for continuing the practice. According to this logic, we should not try to prevent people from murdering other people, since this has also been done since the earliest of times"
About this Quote
Singer’s move here is to take a cozy, overused defense of meat-eating - “we’ve always done it” - and expose it as moral laziness masquerading as common sense. The quote works because it doesn’t argue about nutrition, tradition, or individual choice; it attacks the rhetorical structure people reach for when they want the comfort of inevitability. History, Singer suggests, is being smuggled in as permission.
The sharpness comes from the analogy: he yokes animal slaughter to human murder, not because he thinks they are socially identical acts, but because he wants to detonate the underlying claim that longevity equals legitimacy. It’s a novelist’s tactic: escalate the stakes so the reader can’t keep hiding behind “normal.” Once you accept “it’s ancient” as a moral shield, you’ve basically surrendered the idea of progress. Civilization becomes a museum of bad habits.
There’s subtext, too, about how moral circles expand. Singer, a Jewish writer marked by the violence of the 20th century, knew what it meant for cruelty to be normalized, bureaucratized, and defended as routine. His comparison presses on a disturbing continuity: the ability to convert a living being into an object, then call the process necessary.
Culturally, the line anticipates a modern argument against “nature” and “tradition” as ethical trump cards. Singer isn’t begging for sympathy; he’s demanding intellectual honesty. If we pride ourselves on outgrowing barbarism, we don’t get to cite barbarism as evidence we should keep it.
The sharpness comes from the analogy: he yokes animal slaughter to human murder, not because he thinks they are socially identical acts, but because he wants to detonate the underlying claim that longevity equals legitimacy. It’s a novelist’s tactic: escalate the stakes so the reader can’t keep hiding behind “normal.” Once you accept “it’s ancient” as a moral shield, you’ve basically surrendered the idea of progress. Civilization becomes a museum of bad habits.
There’s subtext, too, about how moral circles expand. Singer, a Jewish writer marked by the violence of the 20th century, knew what it meant for cruelty to be normalized, bureaucratized, and defended as routine. His comparison presses on a disturbing continuity: the ability to convert a living being into an object, then call the process necessary.
Culturally, the line anticipates a modern argument against “nature” and “tradition” as ethical trump cards. Singer isn’t begging for sympathy; he’s demanding intellectual honesty. If we pride ourselves on outgrowing barbarism, we don’t get to cite barbarism as evidence we should keep it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Isaac
Add to List





