"People recognize intellectual property the same way they recognize real estate. People understand what property is. But it's a new kind of property, and so the understanding uses new control surfaces. It uses a new way of defining the property"
About this Quote
Nesmith is arguing that intellectual property only feels abstract until you describe it in the oldest language Americans trust: property. Real estate is the clean metaphor because it carries an entire moral toolkit - ownership, trespass, fences, deeds, enforcement. He’s not flattering the public’s sophistication; he’s acknowledging their instincts. People will accept IP as “real” if it can be made legible as something you can point to, defend, and trade.
The pivot is his phrase “new control surfaces,” a musician’s way of talking about interface: knobs, sliders, consoles. In the analog world, control was physical and intuitive. In the digital world, control is designed. Nesmith’s subtext is that IP isn’t just an idea you own; it’s a system you build so ownership can be seen and exercised. The “property” is defined less by the work itself than by the mechanisms around it: contracts, licensing, DRM, platforms, metadata, takedown tools, and payment rails.
Coming from a pop-cultural figure who watched music move from vinyl to streaming, this reads like a pragmatic warning disguised as reassurance. Yes, people can understand IP. But only if the industry keeps inventing the fences - and those fences aren’t neutral. Whoever designs the control surfaces effectively defines the borders of the property, deciding what counts as fair use, what counts as theft, and who gets paid. Nesmith is quietly naming the real fight: not whether creators deserve ownership, but who gets to architect the terms of that ownership in the digital marketplace.
The pivot is his phrase “new control surfaces,” a musician’s way of talking about interface: knobs, sliders, consoles. In the analog world, control was physical and intuitive. In the digital world, control is designed. Nesmith’s subtext is that IP isn’t just an idea you own; it’s a system you build so ownership can be seen and exercised. The “property” is defined less by the work itself than by the mechanisms around it: contracts, licensing, DRM, platforms, metadata, takedown tools, and payment rails.
Coming from a pop-cultural figure who watched music move from vinyl to streaming, this reads like a pragmatic warning disguised as reassurance. Yes, people can understand IP. But only if the industry keeps inventing the fences - and those fences aren’t neutral. Whoever designs the control surfaces effectively defines the borders of the property, deciding what counts as fair use, what counts as theft, and who gets paid. Nesmith is quietly naming the real fight: not whether creators deserve ownership, but who gets to architect the terms of that ownership in the digital marketplace.
Quote Details
| Topic | Technology |
|---|
More Quotes by Michael
Add to List
