"People who don't take risks generally make about two big mistakes a year. People who do take risks generally make about two big mistakes a year"
About this Quote
Drucker slips a neat little blade into the bloated mythology of “safe” decision-making. The line works because it collapses a comforting fiction: that caution is a reliable strategy for avoiding error. By repeating “about two big mistakes a year” on both sides of the ledger, he turns the argument into a deadpan equal sign. Risk isn’t the villain; fallibility is the baseline.
The intent is managerial, not motivational-poster fluff. Drucker isn’t cheering recklessness. He’s stripping away the moralizing that makes risk sound like a character test. In organizations, “prudence” often functions as a status shield: if you avoid bold moves, you can’t be blamed for bold failures. Drucker’s subtext is that this is a bureaucratic illusion. You still make the big mistakes - they just arrive under different costumes: missed opportunities, slow responses, comfort with outdated assumptions. The quote’s quiet provocation is that inaction is not neutral; it’s a choice with its own error rate.
Context matters: Drucker wrote in a century of accelerating complexity - postwar corporate expansion, globalization, knowledge work. In that world, the cost of not experimenting rises, even if the headlines only record the spectacular blowups. His point lands because it reframes risk as informational: taking risks doesn’t increase your capacity to err so much as it increases your capacity to learn. If the mistake count stays roughly constant, the real question becomes: which mistakes buy you better futures?
The intent is managerial, not motivational-poster fluff. Drucker isn’t cheering recklessness. He’s stripping away the moralizing that makes risk sound like a character test. In organizations, “prudence” often functions as a status shield: if you avoid bold moves, you can’t be blamed for bold failures. Drucker’s subtext is that this is a bureaucratic illusion. You still make the big mistakes - they just arrive under different costumes: missed opportunities, slow responses, comfort with outdated assumptions. The quote’s quiet provocation is that inaction is not neutral; it’s a choice with its own error rate.
Context matters: Drucker wrote in a century of accelerating complexity - postwar corporate expansion, globalization, knowledge work. In that world, the cost of not experimenting rises, even if the headlines only record the spectacular blowups. His point lands because it reframes risk as informational: taking risks doesn’t increase your capacity to err so much as it increases your capacity to learn. If the mistake count stays roughly constant, the real question becomes: which mistakes buy you better futures?
Quote Details
| Topic | Learning from Mistakes |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Peter
Add to List





