"Perhaps at a later point important developments will be traced back to September 11. But for now we do not know which of the many scenarios will actually hold in the future"
About this Quote
Habermas refuses the instant-mythmaking that followed 9/11: the rush to treat catastrophe as historical clarity. The line is deceptively mild, but it’s a pointed rebuke to the political class and media ecosystem that want an event to arrive with its meaning prepackaged. “Perhaps” and “for now” aren’t hedges so much as philosophical speed bumps, designed to slow the conversion of trauma into doctrine.
The specific intent is epistemic discipline. Habermas is marking a boundary between what happened and what we can responsibly claim it will produce. In the weeks after September 11, grand narratives multiplied: a “clash of civilizations,” a new century defined by permanent security states, a moral permission slip for preventive war. His insistence that “we do not know” is a challenge to that opportunism. Uncertainty, in his hands, becomes an ethical stance: if the future is genuinely open, then policy choices can’t hide behind destiny.
The subtext is also democratic. Habermas’s career is built around the idea that legitimate power requires public justification, not apocalyptic storytelling. By emphasizing “many scenarios,” he implies contingency and agency: the “developments” later attributed to 9/11 will be, in part, the results of decisions made under its shadow. That’s a quiet indictment of leaders who speak as if history compelled them.
Context matters: written in the early post-9/11 moment, before the Iraq War had fully crystallized its consequences, the quote anticipates a central danger of crisis politics. When meaning is declared too quickly, dissent starts to look like denial. Habermas is trying to keep the interpretive space open long enough for deliberation to survive.
The specific intent is epistemic discipline. Habermas is marking a boundary between what happened and what we can responsibly claim it will produce. In the weeks after September 11, grand narratives multiplied: a “clash of civilizations,” a new century defined by permanent security states, a moral permission slip for preventive war. His insistence that “we do not know” is a challenge to that opportunism. Uncertainty, in his hands, becomes an ethical stance: if the future is genuinely open, then policy choices can’t hide behind destiny.
The subtext is also democratic. Habermas’s career is built around the idea that legitimate power requires public justification, not apocalyptic storytelling. By emphasizing “many scenarios,” he implies contingency and agency: the “developments” later attributed to 9/11 will be, in part, the results of decisions made under its shadow. That’s a quiet indictment of leaders who speak as if history compelled them.
Context matters: written in the early post-9/11 moment, before the Iraq War had fully crystallized its consequences, the quote anticipates a central danger of crisis politics. When meaning is declared too quickly, dissent starts to look like denial. Habermas is trying to keep the interpretive space open long enough for deliberation to survive.
Quote Details
| Topic | Deep |
|---|
More Quotes by Jurgen
Add to List
