"Personality is essential. It is in every work of art. When someone walks on stage for a performance and has charisma, everyone is convinced that he has personality. I find that charisma is merely a form of showmanship. Movie stars usually have it. A politician has to have it"
About this Quote
Personality, Foss insists, is the real medium - the invisible pigment that coats every note, brushstroke, and line reading. Coming from a composer, that claim is quietly provocative: it shifts the conversation away from “craft” as a purely technical triumph and toward the harder-to-teach force that makes technique legible to an audience in the first place. He’s not romanticizing genius so much as pointing to reception. Art doesn’t arrive as raw information; it arrives as a person, or at least the convincing illusion of one.
His sharpest move is the demotion of charisma. In pop culture, charisma is treated like proof of depth: the crowd feels it, therefore it must be real. Foss calls that bluff. Charisma, to him, is showmanship - an external skill, a stage tool. That’s not an insult; it’s a diagnosis. Movie stars “usually have it” because their industry manufactures it, trains it, rewards it. The subtext is almost anthropological: we confuse the glow of performance with the gravity of personality because both create the same social effect - attention, belief, devotion.
Then he lands the political line with a faint chill. A politician “has to have it” not because charisma is noble, but because power in public life depends on being watched and trusted at scale. Foss is sketching a continuum: art, entertainment, politics all compete in the same economy of persuasion. Personality may be essential; charisma is optional but highly marketable. The warning is implicit: a culture that can’t tell the difference will keep electing the best actors.
His sharpest move is the demotion of charisma. In pop culture, charisma is treated like proof of depth: the crowd feels it, therefore it must be real. Foss calls that bluff. Charisma, to him, is showmanship - an external skill, a stage tool. That’s not an insult; it’s a diagnosis. Movie stars “usually have it” because their industry manufactures it, trains it, rewards it. The subtext is almost anthropological: we confuse the glow of performance with the gravity of personality because both create the same social effect - attention, belief, devotion.
Then he lands the political line with a faint chill. A politician “has to have it” not because charisma is noble, but because power in public life depends on being watched and trusted at scale. Foss is sketching a continuum: art, entertainment, politics all compete in the same economy of persuasion. Personality may be essential; charisma is optional but highly marketable. The warning is implicit: a culture that can’t tell the difference will keep electing the best actors.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Lukas
Add to List








