"Personally, I've found one of the more stimulating ways of playing in recent times has been to kind of move outside the free improvised area and work with people who are probably improvisers but they have a particular way of working"
About this Quote
Bailey is pitching restlessness as a discipline, not a mood. Coming from a guitarist who helped define “free improvisation,” this isn’t a retreat from the form so much as a refusal to let it harden into a genre with its own safe moves. The phrase “move outside” does sly work: it treats “the free improvised area” like a neighborhood you can outgrow, even if you helped build it. Freedom, in Bailey’s telling, is not a permanent address.
The subtext is a quiet critique of improvisation scenes that start policing their own authenticity. “Free” can become a style badge; “improvised” can become a set of expected textures and social signals. Bailey’s antidote is collaboration with musicians who “are probably improvisers” but operate by “a particular way of working” - an emphasis on method over identity. He’s chasing constraint as a catalyst: rule-bound systems, compositional habits, genre vocabularies, or just strong personal procedures that force the improviser to negotiate rather than default.
The intent is also pragmatic and cultural. By the late 20th century, improvised music was increasingly professionalized - festivals, labels, circuits, orthodoxies. Bailey’s “stimulating” is a tell: he’s describing how to keep the music metabolically alive when the audience and the scene can predict the shape of “spontaneity.” Working with people who carry their own frameworks imports friction, and friction is where Bailey’s version of improvisation actually generates meaning: not pure expression, but real-time diplomacy between incompatible logics.
The subtext is a quiet critique of improvisation scenes that start policing their own authenticity. “Free” can become a style badge; “improvised” can become a set of expected textures and social signals. Bailey’s antidote is collaboration with musicians who “are probably improvisers” but operate by “a particular way of working” - an emphasis on method over identity. He’s chasing constraint as a catalyst: rule-bound systems, compositional habits, genre vocabularies, or just strong personal procedures that force the improviser to negotiate rather than default.
The intent is also pragmatic and cultural. By the late 20th century, improvised music was increasingly professionalized - festivals, labels, circuits, orthodoxies. Bailey’s “stimulating” is a tell: he’s describing how to keep the music metabolically alive when the audience and the scene can predict the shape of “spontaneity.” Working with people who carry their own frameworks imports friction, and friction is where Bailey’s version of improvisation actually generates meaning: not pure expression, but real-time diplomacy between incompatible logics.
Quote Details
| Topic | Music |
|---|
More Quotes by Derek
Add to List


