"Pleasure and pain, though directly opposite are contrived to be constant companions"
About this Quote
Charron’s line has the cool, unsentimental poise of a Renaissance moralist who’s watched piety and politics trade masks. “Directly opposite” sets up a clean philosophical binary, then “contrived” quietly detonates it. He’s not describing an accident of human psychology; he’s hinting at design - whether divine, natural, or social - that rigs the emotional economy so no joy arrives unaccompanied, and no suffering remains “pure.” The word choice makes the companionship feel engineered, almost bureaucratic: the universe as an administrator of mixed outcomes.
That matters in Charron’s context. Writing in the wake of the French Wars of Religion, he inherits a culture sickened by certainty and newly attentive to the instability of human judgment. His broader project (in the skeptical, Montaigne-adjacent tradition) is to lower the temperature of moral absolutism. If pleasure and pain are tethered, then the zealot’s promise of unshadowed bliss and the ascetic’s fantasy of meaningful suffering both look like wishful editing.
The subtext is a warning against intoxication by either extreme. Pleasure carries the seed of anxiety (fear of loss, appetite’s escalation); pain carries odd consolations (identity, clarity, relief when it ends). Calling them “constant companions” reframes life as entanglement rather than triumph. It’s a line built to puncture melodrama: not “choose happiness,” not “embrace suffering,” but recognize the rigged pairing and act with more modesty - ethically, politically, and personally.
That matters in Charron’s context. Writing in the wake of the French Wars of Religion, he inherits a culture sickened by certainty and newly attentive to the instability of human judgment. His broader project (in the skeptical, Montaigne-adjacent tradition) is to lower the temperature of moral absolutism. If pleasure and pain are tethered, then the zealot’s promise of unshadowed bliss and the ascetic’s fantasy of meaningful suffering both look like wishful editing.
The subtext is a warning against intoxication by either extreme. Pleasure carries the seed of anxiety (fear of loss, appetite’s escalation); pain carries odd consolations (identity, clarity, relief when it ends). Calling them “constant companions” reframes life as entanglement rather than triumph. It’s a line built to puncture melodrama: not “choose happiness,” not “embrace suffering,” but recognize the rigged pairing and act with more modesty - ethically, politically, and personally.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Pierre
Add to List






