"Poets lose half the praise they should have got, Could it be known what they discreetly blot"
About this Quote
Waller’s couplet is a sly defense of craft disguised as a complaint about credit. The line turns on a deliciously intimate idea: the public only ever applauds the finished poem, never the invisible labor of restraint. If readers could see what the poet “discreetly blot[s]” - the abandoned metaphors, the overreaching conceits, the easy rhymes that felt clever at 2 a.m. - they’d praise the poet more, not less. Revision isn’t merely cleanup; it’s a form of judgment, and Waller frames that judgment as the true mark of skill.
The verb choice matters. “Discreetly” suggests tact and self-command, not just correction. In a 17th-century literary culture that prized polish, balance, and social poise, discretion was an aesthetic and a survival strategy. Waller wrote through civil war, regime change, and the Restoration; knowing what to keep, what to soften, what to leave unsaid wasn’t only poetic technique. It was political intelligence. The couplet quietly aligns the poet’s editorial instinct with a courtier’s instinct: don’t show the seams, don’t reveal the missteps, don’t advertise the messy process.
There’s also a small jab at audiences. Praise is presented as shallowly outcome-driven, blind to the discipline that prevents embarrassment. Waller implies that what separates a poet from a versifier is not the ability to produce lines, but the willingness to destroy them. The poem’s best feature, in other words, is the poet’s capacity for refusal.
The verb choice matters. “Discreetly” suggests tact and self-command, not just correction. In a 17th-century literary culture that prized polish, balance, and social poise, discretion was an aesthetic and a survival strategy. Waller wrote through civil war, regime change, and the Restoration; knowing what to keep, what to soften, what to leave unsaid wasn’t only poetic technique. It was political intelligence. The couplet quietly aligns the poet’s editorial instinct with a courtier’s instinct: don’t show the seams, don’t reveal the missteps, don’t advertise the messy process.
There’s also a small jab at audiences. Praise is presented as shallowly outcome-driven, blind to the discipline that prevents embarrassment. Waller implies that what separates a poet from a versifier is not the ability to produce lines, but the willingness to destroy them. The poem’s best feature, in other words, is the poet’s capacity for refusal.
Quote Details
| Topic | Poetry |
|---|
More Quotes by Edmund
Add to List






