"Politics swings like a pendulum"
About this Quote
“Politics swings like a pendulum” is the kind of line a seasoned operator uses when he wants to sound wise, inevitable, and oddly innocent all at once. Coming from Ed Gillespie, a Republican strategist-turned-politician who’s lived inside the machinery of messaging, the metaphor isn’t just descriptive; it’s strategic. A pendulum suggests natural law: motion that cannot be stopped, only anticipated. That framing quietly depoliticizes political outcomes, turning hard-fought contests over power, policy, and identity into something like weather. You don’t blame the storm; you wait it out.
The intent is comfort with a side of permission. For supporters, it reassures: losses are temporary, your turn will come back. For donors and party insiders, it’s a pitch for patience and continued investment, implying the fundamentals will reassert themselves. For critics, it’s a way to dodge responsibility for what a party does when it has power: if the swing is inevitable, then excesses and backlash become part of the cycle, not a choice someone made.
The subtext is also about control. Pendulums don’t wobble randomly; they follow a predictable arc. Gillespie’s world prizes that predictability because it makes narratives easier to sell: the electorate “overcorrects,” voters “get tired,” the center “returns.” In an era of polarization and asymmetric rule-breaking, the line can read as nostalgia for an older equilibrium - or as a deliberate attempt to conjure it into being. The metaphor doesn’t just report motion; it tries to manufacture inevitability.
The intent is comfort with a side of permission. For supporters, it reassures: losses are temporary, your turn will come back. For donors and party insiders, it’s a pitch for patience and continued investment, implying the fundamentals will reassert themselves. For critics, it’s a way to dodge responsibility for what a party does when it has power: if the swing is inevitable, then excesses and backlash become part of the cycle, not a choice someone made.
The subtext is also about control. Pendulums don’t wobble randomly; they follow a predictable arc. Gillespie’s world prizes that predictability because it makes narratives easier to sell: the electorate “overcorrects,” voters “get tired,” the center “returns.” In an era of polarization and asymmetric rule-breaking, the line can read as nostalgia for an older equilibrium - or as a deliberate attempt to conjure it into being. The metaphor doesn’t just report motion; it tries to manufacture inevitability.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by Ed
Add to List

