"Practically, the desirable situation ought to be one in which any reasonably responsible person willing to accept available employment can find a job paying a living wage within 48 hours"
About this Quote
The audacity of Vickrey's benchmark is the point: 48 hours. Not “eventually,” not “in a growing economy,” not after retraining or relocation. Two days. In a single number he turns employment from a moralized personal journey into a service-level guarantee, like clean water or fire response time. The intent is technocratic but humane: if society can organize finance, logistics, and war on tight timelines, it can organize labor markets so people aren’t left to rot between paychecks.
The phrasing does quiet ideological work. “Reasonably responsible” signals he’s not defending idleness; he’s disarming the familiar counterargument that unemployment is mainly a character flaw. “Willing to accept available employment” concedes flexibility to employers and the messy reality of matching, while still making the public promise legible. The real trigger word is “living wage.” Vickrey isn’t talking about any job. He’s arguing that employment policy fails if it produces work that still requires hunger, debt, or a second job to survive.
Context matters: Vickrey was a Nobel-winning economist associated with public finance and what later gets called “employer of last resort” thinking. Mid-century Keynesian confidence still lingered, but the post-1970s world was already drifting toward treating unemployment as a necessary discipline and low wages as market “signals.” His 48-hour standard exposes that drift as a choice, not a law of nature. It’s a challenge to policymakers: stop celebrating abstract “flexibility” and start measuring success by how quickly ordinary people can get back to stable life.
The phrasing does quiet ideological work. “Reasonably responsible” signals he’s not defending idleness; he’s disarming the familiar counterargument that unemployment is mainly a character flaw. “Willing to accept available employment” concedes flexibility to employers and the messy reality of matching, while still making the public promise legible. The real trigger word is “living wage.” Vickrey isn’t talking about any job. He’s arguing that employment policy fails if it produces work that still requires hunger, debt, or a second job to survive.
Context matters: Vickrey was a Nobel-winning economist associated with public finance and what later gets called “employer of last resort” thinking. Mid-century Keynesian confidence still lingered, but the post-1970s world was already drifting toward treating unemployment as a necessary discipline and low wages as market “signals.” His 48-hour standard exposes that drift as a choice, not a law of nature. It’s a challenge to policymakers: stop celebrating abstract “flexibility” and start measuring success by how quickly ordinary people can get back to stable life.
Quote Details
| Topic | Work |
|---|
More Quotes by William
Add to List
