"Profit per se is not my motive"
About this Quote
“Profit per se is not my motive” is the kind of sentence tech founders reach for when they want the moral glow of a nonprofit without giving up the optionality of a startup. The key move is “per se”: a lawyerly little phrase that concedes profit exists in the room while insisting it’s not the main character. It’s reputational jiu-jitsu, designed to sound principled without making a falsifiable promise.
Coming from Chris Hughes - Facebook co-founder turned investor and media owner - the line lands inside a familiar Silicon Valley script: wealth as a byproduct of “mission,” influence as a form of public service. The subtext is less “I don’t care about money” than “judge me by my stated ideals, not my balance sheet.” In an era when tech fortunes are routinely recast as civic projects (philanthropy, political reform, “saving journalism”), this phrasing also preemptively defuses suspicion. If you’re entering a space like media, politics, or social impact, audiences assume there’s an angle. The sentence tries to remove the angle by declaring purity, even as it keeps the door open to profit, power, or both.
It works because it speaks to a cultural demand: elites must justify themselves in moral language. But it also invites scrutiny. Motive is rarely singular, and “not per se” practically begs you to ask: if not profit, then what - status, legacy, leverage, or the right to steer the conversation?
Coming from Chris Hughes - Facebook co-founder turned investor and media owner - the line lands inside a familiar Silicon Valley script: wealth as a byproduct of “mission,” influence as a form of public service. The subtext is less “I don’t care about money” than “judge me by my stated ideals, not my balance sheet.” In an era when tech fortunes are routinely recast as civic projects (philanthropy, political reform, “saving journalism”), this phrasing also preemptively defuses suspicion. If you’re entering a space like media, politics, or social impact, audiences assume there’s an angle. The sentence tries to remove the angle by declaring purity, even as it keeps the door open to profit, power, or both.
It works because it speaks to a cultural demand: elites must justify themselves in moral language. But it also invites scrutiny. Motive is rarely singular, and “not per se” practically begs you to ask: if not profit, then what - status, legacy, leverage, or the right to steer the conversation?
Quote Details
| Topic | Honesty & Integrity |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Chris
Add to List





