"Psychoanalysts believe that the only 'normal' people are those who cause no trouble either to themselves or anyone else"
About this Quote
A. J. P. Taylor toys with the slippery idea of normality, reducing it to a bland state of causing no trouble to oneself or others. The line is a jab at psychoanalysis and, more broadly, at any authority that claims to define what counts as a healthy mind. If trouble means conflict, anxiety, symptoms, or the friction our desires create in relationships, then almost everyone is disqualified. By that yardstick, normality becomes either vanishingly rare or indistinguishable from passivity.
The joke lands because psychoanalysis is built on the premise that inner conflict is the human condition. Repression, compromise-formation, and symptom are the machinery of everyday life, not exotic disorders. Freud famously aimed to transform neurotic misery into ordinary unhappiness, a modest ideal that already concedes perpetual trouble. Taylor’s quip exposes the paradox: if life is structured by conflict, setting harmlessness as the standard of health smuggles in a moral ideal of compliance rather than a clinical description.
There is a social edge to the remark. Taylor, a historian who celebrated dissent in works like The Trouble Makers, knew that people who disturb the peace often drive change. To equate normal with non-troublesome risks pathologizing originality, protest, and ambition. Mid-century Britain, where psychoanalytic ideas had cultural prestige, also policed respectability; the diagnosis of abnormality could be a tool for enforcing conformity.
Yet the observation also mirrors a truth psychoanalysts themselves note: our unresolved conflicts can cause needless suffering, both to ourselves and others. The question is whether the goal is the abolition of trouble or the wise accommodation of it. Taylor’s irony pushes us to prefer the latter. Human vitality entails a measure of disturbance. A standard that mistakes smoothness for sanity narrows the range of acceptable life and misunderstands how conflict, creativity, and moral courage are entangled.
The joke lands because psychoanalysis is built on the premise that inner conflict is the human condition. Repression, compromise-formation, and symptom are the machinery of everyday life, not exotic disorders. Freud famously aimed to transform neurotic misery into ordinary unhappiness, a modest ideal that already concedes perpetual trouble. Taylor’s quip exposes the paradox: if life is structured by conflict, setting harmlessness as the standard of health smuggles in a moral ideal of compliance rather than a clinical description.
There is a social edge to the remark. Taylor, a historian who celebrated dissent in works like The Trouble Makers, knew that people who disturb the peace often drive change. To equate normal with non-troublesome risks pathologizing originality, protest, and ambition. Mid-century Britain, where psychoanalytic ideas had cultural prestige, also policed respectability; the diagnosis of abnormality could be a tool for enforcing conformity.
Yet the observation also mirrors a truth psychoanalysts themselves note: our unresolved conflicts can cause needless suffering, both to ourselves and others. The question is whether the goal is the abolition of trouble or the wise accommodation of it. Taylor’s irony pushes us to prefer the latter. Human vitality entails a measure of disturbance. A standard that mistakes smoothness for sanity narrows the range of acceptable life and misunderstands how conflict, creativity, and moral courage are entangled.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by J. P. Taylor
Add to List




