"Psychology keeps trying to vindicate human nature. History keeps undermining the effort"
About this Quote
A whole argument gets staged in two curt sentences: the soft-focus discipline versus the bruising archive. Cooley sets up psychology as a kind of defense attorney for the species, always ready with an extenuating circumstance - trauma, conditioning, cognitive bias - that explains why we did what we did without quite letting us be monsters. "Vindicate" is the tell: not merely understand, but clear the name of "human nature" itself, as if there were a stable, basically decent core to rescue.
Then history walks in like cross-examination. Not the inspirational timeline of progress, but the record of recurring appetites: cruelty with paperwork, idealism that curdles into purges, ordinary people discovering how little imagination it takes to participate in harm. Cooley isn't saying psychologists are naive; he's pointing to the institutional incentive. A field built to treat, rehabilitate, and normalize tends to assume there is something salvageable to normalize toward. It needs a patient worth saving.
The line works because it refuses comfort on both sides. History doesn't "disprove" human nature; it undermines the urge to redeem it as a coherent alibi. Cooley, an aphorist with a taste for the acidic, compresses a mid-20th-century mood: after total war, genocide, and bureaucratized violence, any sunny theory of the self sounds like public relations. The subtext is moral, not methodological: stop treating explanation as acquittal. If psychology wants to help, it has to live with history's evidence - not argue it away.
Then history walks in like cross-examination. Not the inspirational timeline of progress, but the record of recurring appetites: cruelty with paperwork, idealism that curdles into purges, ordinary people discovering how little imagination it takes to participate in harm. Cooley isn't saying psychologists are naive; he's pointing to the institutional incentive. A field built to treat, rehabilitate, and normalize tends to assume there is something salvageable to normalize toward. It needs a patient worth saving.
The line works because it refuses comfort on both sides. History doesn't "disprove" human nature; it undermines the urge to redeem it as a coherent alibi. Cooley, an aphorist with a taste for the acidic, compresses a mid-20th-century mood: after total war, genocide, and bureaucratized violence, any sunny theory of the self sounds like public relations. The subtext is moral, not methodological: stop treating explanation as acquittal. If psychology wants to help, it has to live with history's evidence - not argue it away.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|---|
| Source | Aphorism attributed to Mason Cooley — commonly cited; original publication not specified (see Mason Cooley Wikiquote). |
More Quotes by Mason
Add to List






