"Putting together a counter- terrorism policy, it's very easy to look at law enforcement or defense, military action or stopping the money flows or whatever, but the really difficult part is integrating all aspects of the policy, and I think she put a lot of emphasis on that"
About this Quote
Technocracy rarely admits its own limits, but Lee H. Hamilton does, in that dry, committee-room way that makes the confession feel all the more credible. His point isn’t that counterterrorism is complicated (everyone says that); it’s that the American instinct is to treat it like a menu. Pick a tool: cops, soldiers, sanctions, financial tracking. Each item has a constituency, a budget line, a set of metrics that can be briefed to Congress. Integration, by contrast, is the unglamorous work of forcing those tools to talk to one another, surrender turf, share intelligence, and accept trade-offs. It’s the part that fails quietly until it fails loudly.
The quote’s structure mirrors the problem. Hamilton lists discrete levers in a breathless chain - “law enforcement or defense, military action or stopping the money flows or whatever” - then pivots to the lone singular: “the really difficult part.” That “or whatever” is doing cultural work: it signals how easily the system piles on initiatives without building an architecture to connect them. The subtext is an indictment of bureaucratic fragmentation, not of any single tactic.
Contextually, Hamilton is speaking from the post-9/11 ecosystem he helped shape, when “whole-of-government” became a catchphrase precisely because agencies were optimized for missions, not coherence. His mention of “she” reads like a pointed endorsement of a leader who valued coordination over optics. In a political culture addicted to decisive gestures, Hamilton is elevating something harder to campaign on: competence as choreography.
The quote’s structure mirrors the problem. Hamilton lists discrete levers in a breathless chain - “law enforcement or defense, military action or stopping the money flows or whatever” - then pivots to the lone singular: “the really difficult part.” That “or whatever” is doing cultural work: it signals how easily the system piles on initiatives without building an architecture to connect them. The subtext is an indictment of bureaucratic fragmentation, not of any single tactic.
Contextually, Hamilton is speaking from the post-9/11 ecosystem he helped shape, when “whole-of-government” became a catchphrase precisely because agencies were optimized for missions, not coherence. His mention of “she” reads like a pointed endorsement of a leader who valued coordination over optics. In a political culture addicted to decisive gestures, Hamilton is elevating something harder to campaign on: competence as choreography.
Quote Details
| Topic | Vision & Strategy |
|---|
More Quotes by Lee
Add to List

