"Questioning the nature and implications of liminal instances necessarily involves failure, if only in the specifically technical sense of entering spaces where prevailing criteria of success scarcely apply"
About this Quote
Ferneyhough is smuggling an aesthetic manifesto into what sounds like seminar-room prose: if you go looking for the meaning of threshold experiences, you will fail, and that failure is the point. The key move is the redefinition of failure as a “specifically technical” condition, not a moral one. He’s carving out a protected zone for artistic inquiry where ordinary scorekeeping (clarity, resolution, even listenability) can’t quite land.
“Liminal instances” reads like a composer’s version of the in-between: moments where form is dissolving but not gone, where perception is working overtime to stitch together continuity. Ferneyhough’s music, famously dense and “difficult,” lives there. So the line doubles as a preemptive rebuttal to critics who treat difficulty as pretension or incompetence: you can’t judge a border crossing by the laws of the country you just left.
The subtext is also quietly anti-consumer. In a culture that demands frictionless access and quick metrics of payoff, he insists that serious questioning entails stepping into regions where “prevailing criteria of success scarcely apply.” That’s not just about complexity; it’s about resisting the idea that art’s job is to reassure, summarize, or deliver clean outcomes. Ferneyhough frames ambiguity as a methodological necessity: when you interrogate the thresholds, you also interrogate the tools you use to measure. Failure becomes a kind of rigor, the honest trace left when your categories can’t keep up with experience.
“Liminal instances” reads like a composer’s version of the in-between: moments where form is dissolving but not gone, where perception is working overtime to stitch together continuity. Ferneyhough’s music, famously dense and “difficult,” lives there. So the line doubles as a preemptive rebuttal to critics who treat difficulty as pretension or incompetence: you can’t judge a border crossing by the laws of the country you just left.
The subtext is also quietly anti-consumer. In a culture that demands frictionless access and quick metrics of payoff, he insists that serious questioning entails stepping into regions where “prevailing criteria of success scarcely apply.” That’s not just about complexity; it’s about resisting the idea that art’s job is to reassure, summarize, or deliver clean outcomes. Ferneyhough frames ambiguity as a methodological necessity: when you interrogate the thresholds, you also interrogate the tools you use to measure. Failure becomes a kind of rigor, the honest trace left when your categories can’t keep up with experience.
Quote Details
| Topic | Deep |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Brian
Add to List








