"Quite frankly, I think nothing could do more to immediately bolster national security then enabling us to produce more oil and gas here at home at a price consumers could afford"
About this Quote
The line is engineered to make a complicated bargain sound like common sense. Gramm opens with "Quite frankly" as a credibility cue, a rhetorical shoulder tap that signals candor while skipping the hard part: evidence. Then he welds two anxieties into one: national security and the price at the pump. In a single breath, energy policy becomes patriotism, and drilling becomes defense.
The most revealing move is the absolutism: "nothing could do more". That phrasing doesn’t just argue for domestic production; it tries to foreclose alternatives before they’re even named. Efficiency standards, strategic reserves, diplomacy, grid resilience, electrification, and renewables are implicitly demoted to second-tier gestures. By framing the solution as immediate and unmatched, Gramm aims to collapse time horizons - voters want relief now, and politicians want a lever that looks like a switch.
"Here at home" is doing cultural work, too. It smuggles in a distrust of foreign entanglement (OPEC, Russia, the Middle East) and recasts dependence as weakness. Domestic extraction becomes sovereignty. The closing clause, "at a price consumers could afford", adds a populist seal, but it also dodges the uncomfortable reality that oil is globally priced and production decisions don’t translate cleanly into cheaper gasoline. The subtext is that regulation, environmental limits, or climate concerns are luxuries - nice ideas, but irresponsible in a world of threats and budgets. Gramm isn’t just making an energy argument; he’s offering an identity: the serious nation drills, the naive one hesitates.
The most revealing move is the absolutism: "nothing could do more". That phrasing doesn’t just argue for domestic production; it tries to foreclose alternatives before they’re even named. Efficiency standards, strategic reserves, diplomacy, grid resilience, electrification, and renewables are implicitly demoted to second-tier gestures. By framing the solution as immediate and unmatched, Gramm aims to collapse time horizons - voters want relief now, and politicians want a lever that looks like a switch.
"Here at home" is doing cultural work, too. It smuggles in a distrust of foreign entanglement (OPEC, Russia, the Middle East) and recasts dependence as weakness. Domestic extraction becomes sovereignty. The closing clause, "at a price consumers could afford", adds a populist seal, but it also dodges the uncomfortable reality that oil is globally priced and production decisions don’t translate cleanly into cheaper gasoline. The subtext is that regulation, environmental limits, or climate concerns are luxuries - nice ideas, but irresponsible in a world of threats and budgets. Gramm isn’t just making an energy argument; he’s offering an identity: the serious nation drills, the naive one hesitates.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Phil
Add to List

