"Recent action in Syria and Palestine also tell us that the awakening voices of democracy in those regions are occurring, and that those in that region are able to pursue it without being stifled by terrorists that are despotic"
About this Quote
Judd Gregg’s sentence reads like a press-release trying to launder a complicated geopolitical moment into a single upbeat storyline: democracy is “awakening,” and the only thing that ever really blocks it is “terrorists” and “despotic” actors. The intent is tidy reassurance. It frames U.S.-aligned policy as being on the right side of history, while implying that recent upheavals in Syria and Palestine are evidence of democratic momentum rather than symptoms of fragmentation, occupation, authoritarian resilience, or foreign meddling.
The subtext is doing most of the work. “Awakening voices” is a flattering metaphor that borrows the moral glamour of the Arab Spring-era imagination, where protest equals progress and history moves in a straight line toward liberal governance. That’s rhetorically useful in Washington because it turns messy violence into a recognizable genre: oppressed people finally speaking, villains trying to silence them, outsiders positioned as enablers of freedom. The phrase “without being stifled” is especially revealing; it’s passive and antiseptic, avoiding any accounting of who is doing the stifling beyond the catchall “terrorists,” a term that can be elastic enough to fit enemies and inconvenient factions alike.
Context matters because “Syria and Palestine” aren’t parallel cases, yet the quote yokes them together as if they share one democratic arc. That collapse of specificity is strategic: it sidesteps the moral and legal asymmetries that make Palestine politically radioactive in U.S. discourse, and it blurs Syria’s civil conflict into a morality play. The result is language built to justify a posture - supportive, vigilant, righteous - while remaining vague enough to evade the hard questions democracy movements always raise: who gets legitimacy, who defines “terror,” and what costs are being quietly accepted in democracy’s name.
The subtext is doing most of the work. “Awakening voices” is a flattering metaphor that borrows the moral glamour of the Arab Spring-era imagination, where protest equals progress and history moves in a straight line toward liberal governance. That’s rhetorically useful in Washington because it turns messy violence into a recognizable genre: oppressed people finally speaking, villains trying to silence them, outsiders positioned as enablers of freedom. The phrase “without being stifled” is especially revealing; it’s passive and antiseptic, avoiding any accounting of who is doing the stifling beyond the catchall “terrorists,” a term that can be elastic enough to fit enemies and inconvenient factions alike.
Context matters because “Syria and Palestine” aren’t parallel cases, yet the quote yokes them together as if they share one democratic arc. That collapse of specificity is strategic: it sidesteps the moral and legal asymmetries that make Palestine politically radioactive in U.S. discourse, and it blurs Syria’s civil conflict into a morality play. The result is language built to justify a posture - supportive, vigilant, righteous - while remaining vague enough to evade the hard questions democracy movements always raise: who gets legitimacy, who defines “terror,” and what costs are being quietly accepted in democracy’s name.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Judd
Add to List

