"Red Carpet has a nice package abstraction layer that allows us to support RPMs and DEBs transparently"
About this Quote
“Nice package abstraction layer” is corporate understatement hiding a very old pain: Linux isn’t one platform, it’s a patchwork of competing standards that punish anyone trying to ship software at scale. Nat Friedman’s line reads like a calm engineering update, but the subtext is strategy. Red Carpet (Ximian’s installer/updater, in its moment) wasn’t just about making installs easier; it was about turning distribution chaos into something a company could productize, support, and sell.
The key verb is “support.” Friedman isn’t praising elegance for its own sake. He’s signaling operational leverage: if you can treat RPM and DEB as interchangeable backends, you can promise customers consistency across Red Hat-style and Debian-style worlds without doubling your engineering staff. “Transparently” is doing the heavy lifting, too. It’s an aspiration and a sales pitch: users shouldn’t have to learn the tribal differences between ecosystems, and businesses shouldn’t have to pick sides in the packaging war.
Context matters: early-2000s Linux adoption was climbing, but enterprise buyers were wary of fragmentation and the cost of maintenance. An abstraction layer is a bet that the winning move isn’t to defeat the rival format, but to route around it. It’s also a subtle power play: whoever owns the layer that makes packaging “disappear” gets to define the user experience, collect trust, and potentially steer standards later.
Underneath the mild phrasing is a blunt message: we can make Linux feel like a coherent platform, even if it isn’t one.
The key verb is “support.” Friedman isn’t praising elegance for its own sake. He’s signaling operational leverage: if you can treat RPM and DEB as interchangeable backends, you can promise customers consistency across Red Hat-style and Debian-style worlds without doubling your engineering staff. “Transparently” is doing the heavy lifting, too. It’s an aspiration and a sales pitch: users shouldn’t have to learn the tribal differences between ecosystems, and businesses shouldn’t have to pick sides in the packaging war.
Context matters: early-2000s Linux adoption was climbing, but enterprise buyers were wary of fragmentation and the cost of maintenance. An abstraction layer is a bet that the winning move isn’t to defeat the rival format, but to route around it. It’s also a subtle power play: whoever owns the layer that makes packaging “disappear” gets to define the user experience, collect trust, and potentially steer standards later.
Underneath the mild phrasing is a blunt message: we can make Linux feel like a coherent platform, even if it isn’t one.
Quote Details
| Topic | Coding & Programming |
|---|
More Quotes by Nat
Add to List

