"Reduced to its lowest terms, the great struggle which now rocks the whole earth more and more takes on the character of a struggle of the individual versus the state"
About this Quote
There is a lawyerly chill in the phrase "Reduced to its lowest terms" - an attempt to strip history down to a single, clean equation. J. Reuben Clark, speaking as a clergyman with deep institutional gravity, isn’t merely diagnosing a political moment; he’s trying to name the master conflict of the modern age in a way that feels inevitable. The rhetoric does two jobs at once: it universalizes ("the whole earth") and simplifies ("individual versus the state"). That simplification is the point. Once you accept the framing, a vast range of debates - welfare, war powers, education, labor, policing - can be treated as variations on one moral contest.
The subtext is a warning disguised as clarity. "Rocks" suggests upheaval already underway; "more and more" implies acceleration, the sense that neutrality will soon be impossible. Clark’s choice to cast the individual as the vulnerable party gives the sentence its moral tilt. The state is not a shared instrument of democratic will but a looming force with its own appetite. In a religious register, "the individual" also quietly reads as the soul: conscience, agency, and family sovereignty set against bureaucracy’s tendency to standardize.
Context matters. Clark lived through the expansion of the administrative state, two world wars, and the Cold War’s ideology battles - decades when emergency became routine and government’s reach grew under the banner of security and modernization. His line works because it turns that sprawling, messy history into a stark ethical drama: a planet-scale struggle, but intimate enough to land in the private life of one person deciding whether obedience is civic duty or spiritual surrender.
The subtext is a warning disguised as clarity. "Rocks" suggests upheaval already underway; "more and more" implies acceleration, the sense that neutrality will soon be impossible. Clark’s choice to cast the individual as the vulnerable party gives the sentence its moral tilt. The state is not a shared instrument of democratic will but a looming force with its own appetite. In a religious register, "the individual" also quietly reads as the soul: conscience, agency, and family sovereignty set against bureaucracy’s tendency to standardize.
Context matters. Clark lived through the expansion of the administrative state, two world wars, and the Cold War’s ideology battles - decades when emergency became routine and government’s reach grew under the banner of security and modernization. His line works because it turns that sprawling, messy history into a stark ethical drama: a planet-scale struggle, but intimate enough to land in the private life of one person deciding whether obedience is civic duty or spiritual surrender.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Reuben Clark
Add to List










