"Representation of the world, like the world itself, is the work of men; they describe it from their own point of view, which they confuse with the absolute truth"
About this Quote
Every so-called neutral “view from nowhere” has fingerprints on it. Beauvoir’s line is doing two things at once: naming an old power structure and exposing the rhetorical trick that keeps it feeling natural. Men have historically produced the maps, the novels, the laws, the sciences, the news agendas. Then they’ve laundered that partial vantage point into something universal, a default setting for reality itself. The quiet violence isn’t only exclusion; it’s the insistence that exclusion is just how the world is.
The phrasing matters. “Representation of the world” widens the target beyond art into knowledge-making: who gets to define what counts as fact, significance, normalcy. By pairing representation with “the world itself,” she undercuts the comforting distinction between culture and reality. If the world you live in is organized by men, the stories you inherit will mirror that arrangement and justify it, which is why patriarchy survives not just through force but through plausibility.
The key bite is “they confuse [their point of view] with the absolute truth.” Beauvoir isn’t accusing men of simple lying; she’s diagnosing a more insidious epistemic habit: mistaking position for principle. In the context of mid-century existentialism and The Second Sex, this is her argument about the “neutral” human subject that turns out to be male, while women are cast as the deviation, the footnote, the “Other.” Read now, it lands as a warning about algorithms, canons, and “objectivity” itself: power doesn’t merely silence; it narrates.
The phrasing matters. “Representation of the world” widens the target beyond art into knowledge-making: who gets to define what counts as fact, significance, normalcy. By pairing representation with “the world itself,” she undercuts the comforting distinction between culture and reality. If the world you live in is organized by men, the stories you inherit will mirror that arrangement and justify it, which is why patriarchy survives not just through force but through plausibility.
The key bite is “they confuse [their point of view] with the absolute truth.” Beauvoir isn’t accusing men of simple lying; she’s diagnosing a more insidious epistemic habit: mistaking position for principle. In the context of mid-century existentialism and The Second Sex, this is her argument about the “neutral” human subject that turns out to be male, while women are cast as the deviation, the footnote, the “Other.” Read now, it lands as a warning about algorithms, canons, and “objectivity” itself: power doesn’t merely silence; it narrates.
Quote Details
| Topic | Truth |
|---|---|
| Source | The Second Sex (Le Deuxieme Sexe), Simone de Beauvoir, 1949. English translation commonly cited: H. M. Parshley (1953). Sentence appears in Beauvoir's discussion of myths and representation of women. |
More Quotes by Simone
Add to List










