"Republicans use think tanks to come up with a lot of their messages. The think tanks are the single worst, most undisciplined example of communication I've ever seen"
About this Quote
Frank Luntz is the guy who made “death tax” and “climate change” feel like common sense, so his contempt here lands as both confession and power flex. He’s not critiquing ideas; he’s critiquing message discipline. Coming from a pollster-turned-wordsmith whose career is built on testing language until it fits the mouth like a retainer, “undisciplined communication” is the cardinal sin. The jab implies that Republicans have outsourced too much of their political voice to institutions that don’t understand the brutal simplicity required to win airtime, shape headlines, or survive a cable news chyron.
The subtext is a quiet indictment of the conservative ecosystem’s internal incentives. Think tanks aren’t optimized for persuasion; they’re optimized for papers, donors, and ideological credentialing. Their output tends to be long, caveated, and internally competitive - smart people trying to outsmart each other rather than reach voters. Luntz is saying: you can’t govern a narrative with footnotes. He’s also drawing a line between “policy world” seriousness and “campaign world” effectiveness, and he’s staking his authority on the latter.
Context matters: this is an intra-right critique, not a liberal attack. That gives it bite. It suggests Republicans aren’t losing arguments because their policies are indefensible, but because their messaging supply chain is clogged with wonk-speak and factional freelancing. And it’s Luntz, of all people, arguing that the message makers need better messages - which reads less like humility than like a bid to be rehired as the adult in the room.
The subtext is a quiet indictment of the conservative ecosystem’s internal incentives. Think tanks aren’t optimized for persuasion; they’re optimized for papers, donors, and ideological credentialing. Their output tends to be long, caveated, and internally competitive - smart people trying to outsmart each other rather than reach voters. Luntz is saying: you can’t govern a narrative with footnotes. He’s also drawing a line between “policy world” seriousness and “campaign world” effectiveness, and he’s staking his authority on the latter.
Context matters: this is an intra-right critique, not a liberal attack. That gives it bite. It suggests Republicans aren’t losing arguments because their policies are indefensible, but because their messaging supply chain is clogged with wonk-speak and factional freelancing. And it’s Luntz, of all people, arguing that the message makers need better messages - which reads less like humility than like a bid to be rehired as the adult in the room.
Quote Details
| Topic | Management |
|---|
More Quotes by Frank
Add to List





