"Restore human legs as a means of travel. Pedestrians rely on food for fuel and need no special parking facilities"
About this Quote
Mumford’s line lands like an urbanist mic drop: a deadpan reminder that the most sophisticated transportation technology is still the one attached to your hips. The joke is engineered to sound almost embarrassingly obvious, and that’s the point. By describing walking in the clipped utilitarian language usually reserved for cars and infrastructure - “fuel,” “special parking facilities” - he exposes how modern cities normalize the absurd: we treat machines as default citizens and humans as afterthoughts.
The specific intent is reformist, not nostalgic. “Restore” signals damage done, a regression from an earlier civic logic where streets were social space, not traffic sewers. Mumford isn’t merely praising exercise; he’s indicting a planning regime that subsidizes automobility with land, money, and attention, then acts surprised when congestion, pollution, and isolation follow. His framing implies a hidden ledger: pedestrians run on calories (a personal, locally sourced cost), while cars demand sprawling support systems - garages, lots, curb cuts, widened roads - that cities quietly pay for by sacrificing housing, public life, and safety.
Context matters: Mumford wrote across the rise of mass car ownership and postwar suburban expansion, when “progress” was increasingly equated with speed and separation. His subtext is almost moral. A city organized for walking is constrained by human scale; a city organized for cars is constrained by nothing except asphalt and appetite. By treating legs as “a means of travel,” he insists that design should begin with the body - and the commons - rather than the engine.
The specific intent is reformist, not nostalgic. “Restore” signals damage done, a regression from an earlier civic logic where streets were social space, not traffic sewers. Mumford isn’t merely praising exercise; he’s indicting a planning regime that subsidizes automobility with land, money, and attention, then acts surprised when congestion, pollution, and isolation follow. His framing implies a hidden ledger: pedestrians run on calories (a personal, locally sourced cost), while cars demand sprawling support systems - garages, lots, curb cuts, widened roads - that cities quietly pay for by sacrificing housing, public life, and safety.
Context matters: Mumford wrote across the rise of mass car ownership and postwar suburban expansion, when “progress” was increasingly equated with speed and separation. His subtext is almost moral. A city organized for walking is constrained by human scale; a city organized for cars is constrained by nothing except asphalt and appetite. By treating legs as “a means of travel,” he insists that design should begin with the body - and the commons - rather than the engine.
Quote Details
| Topic | Witty One-Liners |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Lewis
Add to List



