"Revolution is a trivial shift in the emphasis of suffering"
About this Quote
Stoppard’s line lands like a heckle aimed at the most solemn word in political romance. “Revolution” usually arrives dressed in capital letters and heroic lighting; he strips it down to bookkeeping: a “shift in the emphasis of suffering.” The sting is in “trivial.” Not because oppression is minor, but because the mechanisms of pain are stubbornly transferable. Replace a flag, rename the ministry, swap the portraits on the wall, and the human costs don’t disappear; they get reassigned.
The phrasing is characteristically Stoppard: brisk, epigrammatic, and theatrical. “Emphasis” is a writer’s term, suggesting suffering isn’t only inflicted but staged, narrated, edited. Power doesn’t merely cause misery; it decides which misery counts, which bodies are legible, which sacrifices get framed as necessary. The line implies that revolutions are often battles over the story of suffering as much as its distribution.
Contextually, Stoppard’s work circles the collision between lofty ideas and messy outcomes, especially in plays like Travesties, where revolutionary politics are filtered through performance, vanity, and historical accident. As a Czech-born British dramatist shaped by 20th-century upheavals, he’s alert to the way liberation movements can harden into new orthodoxies. The subtext isn’t complacency; it’s a warning against mistaking turnover for transformation. If a revolution doesn’t change the infrastructure that produces pain, it risks becoming a rebranding exercise with fresh martyrs and the same old machinery.
The phrasing is characteristically Stoppard: brisk, epigrammatic, and theatrical. “Emphasis” is a writer’s term, suggesting suffering isn’t only inflicted but staged, narrated, edited. Power doesn’t merely cause misery; it decides which misery counts, which bodies are legible, which sacrifices get framed as necessary. The line implies that revolutions are often battles over the story of suffering as much as its distribution.
Contextually, Stoppard’s work circles the collision between lofty ideas and messy outcomes, especially in plays like Travesties, where revolutionary politics are filtered through performance, vanity, and historical accident. As a Czech-born British dramatist shaped by 20th-century upheavals, he’s alert to the way liberation movements can harden into new orthodoxies. The subtext isn’t complacency; it’s a warning against mistaking turnover for transformation. If a revolution doesn’t change the infrastructure that produces pain, it risks becoming a rebranding exercise with fresh martyrs and the same old machinery.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Tom
Add to List







