"Right now there should be a moratorium on the cutting down of old growth in this country. That is a small thing to ask at this point. There is only four percent of old growth left. Ninety-six percent of it has been cut down"
About this Quote
Harrelson’s line lands because it refuses the cozy middle. A “moratorium” is a blunt instrument, and he leans into that bluntness: not a call for better “management,” not a plea for “balance,” but a pause button slammed hard enough to be heard over chainsaws and press releases. The rhetorical trick is in how he frames it as modest. “That is a small thing to ask” dares the listener to justify continued cutting when the remaining resource is already on life support. If you argue with him, you risk sounding like the guy insisting on “just one more” cigarette for a patient in the ICU.
The numbers do the heavy lifting. “Only four percent” isn’t decoration; it’s a moral indictment disguised as arithmetic. By pairing 4 with 96, he turns old-growth logging from a policy debate into an endgame. The subtext: we are not negotiating how to share abundance, we are deciding whether to finish the job. It also quietly calls out the language games that often cushion ecological loss: “sustainable yield,” “working forests,” “offsets.” None of that sounds plausible when you’re down to scraps.
Context matters: Harrelson isn’t speaking as a technocrat; he’s an actor using celebrity as a megaphone, compressing a complex ecosystem argument into something the public can feel in a single breath. It’s activism optimized for a media environment that rewards urgency, and it forces a simple question: if not now, when the last 4 percent is 2?
The numbers do the heavy lifting. “Only four percent” isn’t decoration; it’s a moral indictment disguised as arithmetic. By pairing 4 with 96, he turns old-growth logging from a policy debate into an endgame. The subtext: we are not negotiating how to share abundance, we are deciding whether to finish the job. It also quietly calls out the language games that often cushion ecological loss: “sustainable yield,” “working forests,” “offsets.” None of that sounds plausible when you’re down to scraps.
Context matters: Harrelson isn’t speaking as a technocrat; he’s an actor using celebrity as a megaphone, compressing a complex ecosystem argument into something the public can feel in a single breath. It’s activism optimized for a media environment that rewards urgency, and it forces a simple question: if not now, when the last 4 percent is 2?
Quote Details
| Topic | Nature |
|---|
More Quotes by Woody
Add to List
