"Ronald Reagan's well documented final battles with Alzheimer's disease were fought with the same conviction and courage that his many public battles were fought"
About this Quote
There is a kind of political alchemy in framing Alzheimer’s as a “battle” continuous with Ronald Reagan’s public life: it turns a private, degenerative illness into a final campaign, complete with moral clarity, narrative arc, and heroism. Jenkins isn’t just praising Reagan’s endurance. He’s protecting a brand. By insisting the disease was met with “the same conviction and courage” as Reagan’s presidency, the line welds personal decline to public strength, inviting readers to remember resolve rather than vulnerability.
The intent is strategic reverence. “Well documented” signals that the facts are on the table, as if to pre-empt accusations of mythmaking. But the phrasing also functions like a seal of legitimacy: we’re not denying the tragedy; we’re curating what it should mean. The subtext is that character is consistent across arenas, that the man who stared down political adversaries could also stare down biology. It’s a comforting idea, and politically useful: it discourages readings of Alzheimer’s as humiliation, punishment, or erasure.
Context matters because Reagan’s post-presidential illness became a national parable, especially as his 1994 letter disclosed the diagnosis and later public memory softened the harder edges of his record. Jenkins, as a politician, taps that sanctifying afterlife. The metaphor of “battles” keeps agency at the center even when the disease famously strips agency away. That tension is the point: the line asks us to interpret cognitive loss through the language of willpower, and to keep Reagan’s image intact when the facts of Alzheimer’s threaten to do the opposite.
The intent is strategic reverence. “Well documented” signals that the facts are on the table, as if to pre-empt accusations of mythmaking. But the phrasing also functions like a seal of legitimacy: we’re not denying the tragedy; we’re curating what it should mean. The subtext is that character is consistent across arenas, that the man who stared down political adversaries could also stare down biology. It’s a comforting idea, and politically useful: it discourages readings of Alzheimer’s as humiliation, punishment, or erasure.
Context matters because Reagan’s post-presidential illness became a national parable, especially as his 1994 letter disclosed the diagnosis and later public memory softened the harder edges of his record. Jenkins, as a politician, taps that sanctifying afterlife. The metaphor of “battles” keeps agency at the center even when the disease famously strips agency away. That tension is the point: the line asks us to interpret cognitive loss through the language of willpower, and to keep Reagan’s image intact when the facts of Alzheimer’s threaten to do the opposite.
Quote Details
| Topic | Legacy & Remembrance |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by William
Add to List




