"Roosevelt talked not only about Freedom from Fear, but also Freedom from Want"
About this Quote
Sachs is sneaking a political grenade into what sounds like a civics-class reminder. By pairing Roosevelt's "Freedom from Fear" with "Freedom from Want", he insists the New Deal and wartime liberalism weren’t only about safeguarding citizens from external threats or state coercion; they were about making material insecurity itself a kind of unfreedom. The intent is corrective: he’s pushing back against a narrower, Cold War-flavored American definition of liberty that treats freedom as mostly negative rights - be left alone, don’t be oppressed - while bracketing hunger, illness, and poverty as personal misfortune.
The subtext is a critique of contemporary moral bookkeeping. "Fear" is legible to American politics: enemies, crime, terrorism, authoritarianism. "Want" is messier, implicating wages, healthcare, housing, social insurance - and therefore the legitimacy of government action. Sachs is telling you that our dominant story of Roosevelt gets selectively edited: we quote the stirring, battle-ready language and quietly omit the redistributive promise that would make today’s policy arguments uncomfortable.
Context matters because Roosevelt’s Four Freedoms speech (1941) was propaganda in the best sense: a moral frame for total war and a blueprint for the postwar order. It aimed to fuse national security with economic security, turning welfare into patriotism. Sachs, as an economist who argues for development and public investment, revives that lineage to rebrand social provision not as charity, but as a founding democratic commitment.
The subtext is a critique of contemporary moral bookkeeping. "Fear" is legible to American politics: enemies, crime, terrorism, authoritarianism. "Want" is messier, implicating wages, healthcare, housing, social insurance - and therefore the legitimacy of government action. Sachs is telling you that our dominant story of Roosevelt gets selectively edited: we quote the stirring, battle-ready language and quietly omit the redistributive promise that would make today’s policy arguments uncomfortable.
Context matters because Roosevelt’s Four Freedoms speech (1941) was propaganda in the best sense: a moral frame for total war and a blueprint for the postwar order. It aimed to fuse national security with economic security, turning welfare into patriotism. Sachs, as an economist who argues for development and public investment, revives that lineage to rebrand social provision not as charity, but as a founding democratic commitment.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jeffrey
Add to List









