"Science and literature give me answers. And they ask me questions I will never be able to answer"
About this Quote
Haddon is smuggling a kind of comfort into uncertainty. By pairing science and literature - two domains we’re trained to treat as rivals, the lab versus the library - he frames them as a shared way of living with the world’s complexity. The first sentence is clean, almost declarative: answers exist, methods work, knowledge accumulates. It nods to the seduction of solvable problems, the relief of clarity, the sense that with the right tools you can pin reality down.
Then he flips the mood. The second sentence widens the horizon with a quiet sting: the best thinking doesn’t just resolve confusion, it manufactures better confusion. The subtext is a critique of the “STEM vs. humanities” culture war, where science gets cast as certainty and literature as vibe. Haddon insists both are engines of inquiry; their power is not only to explain but to unsettle. The line “I will never be able to answer” isn’t despair so much as discipline: a refusal of the modern demand that every question be closed, optimized, monetized, or made content-ready.
In context, that stance fits a novelist whose work often circles the boundaries of perception, explanation, and narrative control. Science offers models; literature offers interiority. Together they don’t just tell you what’s true - they show how partial every frame is. The intent lands as a manifesto for intellectual humility: the mature reader isn’t the person with the most answers, but the one who can stay present when the questions stop being winnable.
Then he flips the mood. The second sentence widens the horizon with a quiet sting: the best thinking doesn’t just resolve confusion, it manufactures better confusion. The subtext is a critique of the “STEM vs. humanities” culture war, where science gets cast as certainty and literature as vibe. Haddon insists both are engines of inquiry; their power is not only to explain but to unsettle. The line “I will never be able to answer” isn’t despair so much as discipline: a refusal of the modern demand that every question be closed, optimized, monetized, or made content-ready.
In context, that stance fits a novelist whose work often circles the boundaries of perception, explanation, and narrative control. Science offers models; literature offers interiority. Together they don’t just tell you what’s true - they show how partial every frame is. The intent lands as a manifesto for intellectual humility: the mature reader isn’t the person with the most answers, but the one who can stay present when the questions stop being winnable.
Quote Details
| Topic | Knowledge |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Mark
Add to List





