"Science fiction encourages us to explore... all the futures, good and bad, that the human mind can envision"
About this Quote
Science fiction, in Bradley's framing, isn't an escape hatch from reality; it's a rehearsal space for reality's consequences. The ellipsis matters. "Encourages us to explore..". signals an unfinished mandate, a genre that refuses closure because the future itself won't sit still. By insisting on "all the futures, good and bad", Bradley pushes back against the comforting version of sci-fi as gadget worship or starship wallpaper. The point isn't prediction. It's permission: to imagine outcomes without immediately being punished for pessimism or mocked for hope.
The subtext is moral, almost civic. "That the human mind can envision" quietly centers responsibility where readers often try to place it elsewhere. Futures aren't meteorological events that happen to us; they're products of choices, systems, fears, and desires we can articulate before we enact them. Science fiction becomes a kind of cultural early-warning system, not because it forecasts, but because it stress-tests: what happens when power scales up, when belief hardens, when technology magnifies old inequities instead of dissolving them?
Bradley's context complicates the line in productive ways. Writing through late-20th-century anxieties - Cold War escalation, second-wave feminism, shifting norms around authority and intimacy - she worked in a field where "the future" was often coded male, militarized, and technologically triumphant. Her emphasis on plural futures reads like an argument for narrative diversity itself: more imaginations at the table means more possible worlds, and fewer inevitabilities disguised as destiny.
The subtext is moral, almost civic. "That the human mind can envision" quietly centers responsibility where readers often try to place it elsewhere. Futures aren't meteorological events that happen to us; they're products of choices, systems, fears, and desires we can articulate before we enact them. Science fiction becomes a kind of cultural early-warning system, not because it forecasts, but because it stress-tests: what happens when power scales up, when belief hardens, when technology magnifies old inequities instead of dissolving them?
Bradley's context complicates the line in productive ways. Writing through late-20th-century anxieties - Cold War escalation, second-wave feminism, shifting norms around authority and intimacy - she worked in a field where "the future" was often coded male, militarized, and technologically triumphant. Her emphasis on plural futures reads like an argument for narrative diversity itself: more imaginations at the table means more possible worlds, and fewer inevitabilities disguised as destiny.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Marion
Add to List
