"Science is Christian, not when it condemns itself to the letter of things, but when, in the infinitely little, it discovers as many mysteries and as much depth and power as in the infinitely great"
About this Quote
Quinet is trying to rescue both science and Christianity from the cheap caricatures they were becoming in 19th-century France: science as a cold ledger of facts, religion as a brittle literalism. His pivot phrase, "not when it condemns itself to the letter of things", is a jab at positivism’s self-imposed poverty. A science that only inventories the visible world, he implies, is spiritually stunted - not because it lacks data, but because it lacks awe.
The provocation sits in the reversal: science becomes "Christian" precisely when it refuses to be merely materialist. Quinet isn’t arguing that microscopes prove the Gospels; he’s proposing a temperament. Christianity here functions less as doctrine than as a posture toward reality: humility before depths you can’t finish explaining. The "infinitely little" (cells, dust, mechanisms) is not the debunking of mystery but its new address. That’s a savvy rhetorical move in an era when geology, evolutionary thinking, and industrial modernity were shrinking sacred narratives while expanding the universe of observable phenomena.
Subtext: Quinet wants permission for modern intellect to keep its reverence without surrendering its rigor. By granting the microcosm the same "depth and power" as the macrocosm, he collapses a common hierarchy - the spectacular heavens versus the mundane speck. It’s an argument against a disenchanted modernity: the microscope, like the telescope, can be a chapel if the observer refuses to reduce reality to mere "letters."
The provocation sits in the reversal: science becomes "Christian" precisely when it refuses to be merely materialist. Quinet isn’t arguing that microscopes prove the Gospels; he’s proposing a temperament. Christianity here functions less as doctrine than as a posture toward reality: humility before depths you can’t finish explaining. The "infinitely little" (cells, dust, mechanisms) is not the debunking of mystery but its new address. That’s a savvy rhetorical move in an era when geology, evolutionary thinking, and industrial modernity were shrinking sacred narratives while expanding the universe of observable phenomena.
Subtext: Quinet wants permission for modern intellect to keep its reverence without surrendering its rigor. By granting the microcosm the same "depth and power" as the macrocosm, he collapses a common hierarchy - the spectacular heavens versus the mundane speck. It’s an argument against a disenchanted modernity: the microscope, like the telescope, can be a chapel if the observer refuses to reduce reality to mere "letters."
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|
More Quotes by Edgar
Add to List





