"Science is properly more scrupulous than dogma. Dogma gives a charter to mistake, but the very breath of science is a contest with mistake, and must keep the conscience alive"
About this Quote
Eliot turns epistemology into a moral drama: not a dry contest between “science” and “religion,” but a fight over what kind of conscience a society is allowed to have. The line “dogma gives a charter to mistake” is devastating because it frames certainty as an institution with paperwork. Mistakes aren’t just made; they’re authorized, protected by doctrine that treats doubt as disloyalty. That’s a Victorian warning shot at any system - ecclesiastical, political, even social - that turns belief into bureaucracy.
Then she pivots to a kinetic image: “the very breath of science.” Science isn’t a pile of facts; it’s an ethic of self-interruption. By calling it a “contest with mistake,” Eliot insists that error isn’t an embarrassment to be hidden but the engine of progress. The subtext is almost Protestant in its discipline: redemption through constant self-examination. Only here the confessional isn’t a church; it’s method.
The kicker is “must keep the conscience alive.” Eliot isn’t defending science as cold rationalism. She’s defending it as a character trait. In an era when Darwin, geology, and higher criticism were destabilizing inherited certainties, she argues that intellectual humility is the real spiritual practice. The intent isn’t to replace dogma with smug scientism; it’s to demand a culture where being wrong is survivable, even honorable - because the alternative is a comfort so total it becomes permission to harm.
Then she pivots to a kinetic image: “the very breath of science.” Science isn’t a pile of facts; it’s an ethic of self-interruption. By calling it a “contest with mistake,” Eliot insists that error isn’t an embarrassment to be hidden but the engine of progress. The subtext is almost Protestant in its discipline: redemption through constant self-examination. Only here the confessional isn’t a church; it’s method.
The kicker is “must keep the conscience alive.” Eliot isn’t defending science as cold rationalism. She’s defending it as a character trait. In an era when Darwin, geology, and higher criticism were destabilizing inherited certainties, she argues that intellectual humility is the real spiritual practice. The intent isn’t to replace dogma with smug scientism; it’s to demand a culture where being wrong is survivable, even honorable - because the alternative is a comfort so total it becomes permission to harm.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|
More Quotes by George
Add to List




