"Scientia is knowledge. It is only in the popular mind that it is equated with facts"
About this Quote
Polanyi is taking a quiet scalpel to a loud modern habit: treating science as a warehouse of certified trivia. By starting with the Latin root, scientia, he reminds you that “science” originally names a way of knowing, not a pile of things known. The jab lands in the second sentence. “Only in the popular mind” is polite phrasing with an edge: the misconception isn’t a small error, it’s a cultural reflex. We’ve trained ourselves to hear “science” and picture flashcards, not judgment.
The intent is defensive and ambitious at once. Defensive, because public debates routinely demand “just the facts,” as if facts arrive pre-labeled and self-interpreting. Ambitious, because he’s reclaiming science as an active practice: selecting what counts as evidence, deciding what to measure, building models, arguing about uncertainty, revising. Facts are the outputs; knowledge is the organized, contestable structure that makes facts meaningful.
The subtext also pushes back against a certain technocratic arrogance. If science were merely facts, it could be downloaded, credentialed, and deployed without humility. Polanyi implies the opposite: real knowledge includes interpretation, limits, and the trained intuition of a community. Coming from a Nobel-winning chemist who watched “scientific authority” get politicized across the Cold War and beyond, the line reads like a warning label for our information economy: you can memorize facts and still miss what science is for, and how it actually works.
The intent is defensive and ambitious at once. Defensive, because public debates routinely demand “just the facts,” as if facts arrive pre-labeled and self-interpreting. Ambitious, because he’s reclaiming science as an active practice: selecting what counts as evidence, deciding what to measure, building models, arguing about uncertainty, revising. Facts are the outputs; knowledge is the organized, contestable structure that makes facts meaningful.
The subtext also pushes back against a certain technocratic arrogance. If science were merely facts, it could be downloaded, credentialed, and deployed without humility. Polanyi implies the opposite: real knowledge includes interpretation, limits, and the trained intuition of a community. Coming from a Nobel-winning chemist who watched “scientific authority” get politicized across the Cold War and beyond, the line reads like a warning label for our information economy: you can memorize facts and still miss what science is for, and how it actually works.
Quote Details
| Topic | Knowledge |
|---|
More Quotes by John
Add to List
