"Scientific progress makes moral progress a necessity; for if man's power is increased, the checks that restrain him from abusing it must be strengthened"
About this Quote
De Stael is doing something slyly modern here: she treats science not as a triumphal march but as an escalation problem. More power does not automatically mean more wisdom; it means higher stakes. Her sentence is engineered like a warning label. The first clause flatters the Enlightenment faith in “progress,” then pivots into an obligation: moral progress becomes “a necessity,” not a virtue. That word matters. She’s stripping away the comforting idea that ethics is optional, or that society can improvise guardrails after the fact.
The subtext is a critique of the era’s self-congratulation. In the late 18th and early 19th centuries, “improvement” was the fashionable religion: reason, industry, empire, and the new sciences promised mastery over nature and, implicitly, over people. De Stael, a liberal aristocrat shaped by the French Revolution’s whiplash (ideals to terror to Napoleon), knew what happens when capacity outpaces restraint. Her “checks” aren’t just private conscience; they suggest institutions, laws, norms, and education - the cultural infrastructure that keeps force from becoming policy.
Rhetorically, she avoids melodrama by speaking in mechanics: increased power requires strengthened restraints. It’s almost engineering logic, which is precisely why it lands. She borrows the language of systems to argue for character and governance. The line anticipates our own dilemma: from industrialization to surveillance to biotech, the question isn’t whether we can build it, but whether we’ve built the brakes with the same ambition.
The subtext is a critique of the era’s self-congratulation. In the late 18th and early 19th centuries, “improvement” was the fashionable religion: reason, industry, empire, and the new sciences promised mastery over nature and, implicitly, over people. De Stael, a liberal aristocrat shaped by the French Revolution’s whiplash (ideals to terror to Napoleon), knew what happens when capacity outpaces restraint. Her “checks” aren’t just private conscience; they suggest institutions, laws, norms, and education - the cultural infrastructure that keeps force from becoming policy.
Rhetorically, she avoids melodrama by speaking in mechanics: increased power requires strengthened restraints. It’s almost engineering logic, which is precisely why it lands. She borrows the language of systems to argue for character and governance. The line anticipates our own dilemma: from industrialization to surveillance to biotech, the question isn’t whether we can build it, but whether we’ve built the brakes with the same ambition.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|
More Quotes by Madame
Add to List
