"Scientists are really very conscious of the fact that they stand on the shoulders of an enormous tree of preceding workers and that their own contribution is not so enormous"
About this Quote
There is a quiet defensive humility baked into Fleischmann's line, and it lands differently because it comes from a scientist whose name will forever be braided with the cold fusion fiasco. The sentence isn’t just modesty; it’s an argument about how knowledge actually gets made. By swapping Newton’s heroic “giants” for an “enormous tree,” Fleischmann turns discovery from a pedestal into an ecosystem: roots, trunk, branches, deadwood, grafts. No single paper is the tree. It’s a season on it.
The intent is twofold. First, it’s a reminder to outsiders that science is cumulative, procedural, and often unglamorous. Breakthrough culture loves lone geniuses; scientists, he insists, know better. Second, it’s an internal ethic: the lab is supposed to reward method over myth-making, credit over charisma. That phrase “really very conscious” sounds like someone pushing back against a caricature of scientists as arrogant gatekeepers.
The subtext, given Fleischmann’s history, reads like a plea for proportional judgment. If your contribution is “not so enormous,” then neither is your individual culpability when a sensational claim collapses. Cold fusion’s saga was a collision between slow verification and fast media; this quote implicitly sides with the slow. It frames scientific work as stewardship, not conquest.
Context matters: late-20th-century research was already tilting toward hype, funding battles, and headline incentives. Fleischmann is trying to reinstall the old norm: you don’t get to be a lone prophet in a field built to distrust prophets.
The intent is twofold. First, it’s a reminder to outsiders that science is cumulative, procedural, and often unglamorous. Breakthrough culture loves lone geniuses; scientists, he insists, know better. Second, it’s an internal ethic: the lab is supposed to reward method over myth-making, credit over charisma. That phrase “really very conscious” sounds like someone pushing back against a caricature of scientists as arrogant gatekeepers.
The subtext, given Fleischmann’s history, reads like a plea for proportional judgment. If your contribution is “not so enormous,” then neither is your individual culpability when a sensational claim collapses. Cold fusion’s saga was a collision between slow verification and fast media; this quote implicitly sides with the slow. It frames scientific work as stewardship, not conquest.
Context matters: late-20th-century research was already tilting toward hype, funding battles, and headline incentives. Fleischmann is trying to reinstall the old norm: you don’t get to be a lone prophet in a field built to distrust prophets.
Quote Details
| Topic | Knowledge |
|---|
More Quotes by Martin
Add to List
