"Secondly, the nature of the revolutions which have altered the surface of the earth must have had a more decisive effect on the terrestrial quadrupeds than on the marine animals"
About this Quote
“Secondly” lands like a gavel. Cuvier isn’t tossing off a casual observation; he’s building a prosecutorial case about catastrophe, using the calm, enumerated cadence of a courtroom brief. In the early 19th century, before Darwin reframed life as a long, branching argument for gradual change, Cuvier was the great anatomist of extinction and discontinuity. “Revolutions” is his loaded term: not political upheavals but geological convulsions - floods, uplifts, sudden reworkings of terrain - that “altered the surface of the earth.” The phrase is doing double duty. It gives nature a history (a shocking idea at the time) and also smuggles in a tempo: abrupt, consequential, irreversible.
The rhetorical move hinges on a comparative vulnerability. Terrestrial quadrupeds depend on stable land: food webs anchored to soils, climates, and vegetation. If the “surface” is rearranged, their entire operating system breaks. Marine animals, by contrast, inhabit a medium that buffers change; the ocean’s continuity offers refuge when coastlines shift or continents buckle. Cuvier is mapping extinction risk onto habitat physics.
Subtext: he’s defending a worldview where the fossil record’s breaks are real breaks, not just missing pages. By arguing that land animals would be hit “more decisively,” he explains why you might see sharp turnovers in terrestrial fossils while marine lineages look steadier. It’s also a quiet rebuke to speculative evolutionary storytelling: the pattern isn’t a slow morphing of species but the punctuated aftermath of Earth’s violent edits.
The rhetorical move hinges on a comparative vulnerability. Terrestrial quadrupeds depend on stable land: food webs anchored to soils, climates, and vegetation. If the “surface” is rearranged, their entire operating system breaks. Marine animals, by contrast, inhabit a medium that buffers change; the ocean’s continuity offers refuge when coastlines shift or continents buckle. Cuvier is mapping extinction risk onto habitat physics.
Subtext: he’s defending a worldview where the fossil record’s breaks are real breaks, not just missing pages. By arguing that land animals would be hit “more decisively,” he explains why you might see sharp turnovers in terrestrial fossils while marine lineages look steadier. It’s also a quiet rebuke to speculative evolutionary storytelling: the pattern isn’t a slow morphing of species but the punctuated aftermath of Earth’s violent edits.
Quote Details
| Topic | Nature |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by George
Add to List



