"Self-sacrifice which denies common sense is not a virtue. It's a spiritual dissipation"
About this Quote
Deland’s line has the cool snap of a moral rebuke aimed at a culture that romanticizes suffering. She’s not attacking generosity; she’s attacking the performance of goodness that ignores reality. “Self-sacrifice” is usually sold as moral gold, especially in late-19th- and early-20th-century domestic fiction where women, in particular, are praised for enduring quietly. Deland punctures that halo by adding a simple test: common sense. If your giving collapses the household, enables someone else’s irresponsibility, or turns you into a martyr with a clenched jaw, she suggests it’s not sanctity. It’s dysfunction with better branding.
The phrase “spiritual dissipation” is the tell. Dissipation is what Victorians called wasting your life in vice or frivolity; Deland flips the charge onto supposedly pious behavior. You can squander your inner life not only through indulgence but through relentless self-erasure. The subtext is psychologically modern: self-denial can be a kind of escape, a way to avoid honest conflict, boundaries, or the messy work of mutual responsibility. It lets you feel pure while sidestepping practical consequences.
Context matters: Deland wrote in an era steeped in Protestant moral language, charity culture, and gendered ideals of duty. By framing irrational sacrifice as “dissipation,” she borrows the era’s own moral vocabulary to argue for something quietly radical: ethics aren’t proven by how much you bleed, but by whether your choices actually sustain human life.
The phrase “spiritual dissipation” is the tell. Dissipation is what Victorians called wasting your life in vice or frivolity; Deland flips the charge onto supposedly pious behavior. You can squander your inner life not only through indulgence but through relentless self-erasure. The subtext is psychologically modern: self-denial can be a kind of escape, a way to avoid honest conflict, boundaries, or the messy work of mutual responsibility. It lets you feel pure while sidestepping practical consequences.
Context matters: Deland wrote in an era steeped in Protestant moral language, charity culture, and gendered ideals of duty. By framing irrational sacrifice as “dissipation,” she borrows the era’s own moral vocabulary to argue for something quietly radical: ethics aren’t proven by how much you bleed, but by whether your choices actually sustain human life.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Margaret
Add to List










