"Serious illness doesn't bother me for long because I am too inhospitable a host"
About this Quote
Schweitzer’s line lands with the cool audacity of someone refusing to grant illness the dignity of a rival. Calling himself an “inhospitable host” flips the usual script: the body isn’t a fragile home invaded by disease, it’s a property owner who can deny a troublesome tenant. The wit is disciplined, not cute. It’s the kind of metaphor that lets a theologian smuggle in an ethic of will without preaching it outright.
The specific intent reads as self-command. Schweitzer isn’t claiming invulnerability; he’s asserting a stance toward suffering that starves it of narrative power. Illness “doesn’t bother me for long” because he won’t cooperate with its demands - for attention, for self-pity, for the slow rearranging of one’s identity around symptoms. The subtext is almost ascetic: pain may arrive, but it won’t be entertained.
Context matters. Schweitzer built a public life around service and endurance, a moral brand that could easily curdle into sanctimony. This sentence dodges that by sounding more like a private rule than a public virtue. It also reflects early-20th-century confidence in character as a kind of medicine: the belief that temperament can set terms with the body, even if it can’t finally win.
The rhetorical power comes from its domestic intimacy. “Host” is a word of warmth and hospitality; he weaponizes it. The result is a compact theology of agency: you can’t always prevent affliction, but you can refuse to make room for it.
The specific intent reads as self-command. Schweitzer isn’t claiming invulnerability; he’s asserting a stance toward suffering that starves it of narrative power. Illness “doesn’t bother me for long” because he won’t cooperate with its demands - for attention, for self-pity, for the slow rearranging of one’s identity around symptoms. The subtext is almost ascetic: pain may arrive, but it won’t be entertained.
Context matters. Schweitzer built a public life around service and endurance, a moral brand that could easily curdle into sanctimony. This sentence dodges that by sounding more like a private rule than a public virtue. It also reflects early-20th-century confidence in character as a kind of medicine: the belief that temperament can set terms with the body, even if it can’t finally win.
The rhetorical power comes from its domestic intimacy. “Host” is a word of warmth and hospitality; he weaponizes it. The result is a compact theology of agency: you can’t always prevent affliction, but you can refuse to make room for it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Witty One-Liners |
|---|
More Quotes by Albert
Add to List




